Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Corbygreen2 sentences2026See State v. Corby, 314 Kan. 794 , 797, 502 P.3d 111 (2022). 2026See State v. Corby, 314 Kan. 794 , 797, 502 P.3d 111 (2022). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Perrygreen2 sentences2001See State v. Perry, 266 Kan. 224, 235 , 968 P.2d 674 (1998). 2001See State v. Perry, 266 Kan. 224, 235 , 968 P.2d 674 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Roberts
green
1 sentence2022This means that when the defendant admits to their criminal history score and does not object to the State's criminal history determination before sentencing, the burden of proof shifts to the defendant for any later objection or appeal "[i]f the offender later challenges such offender's criminal history, which has been previously established, the burden of proof shall shift to the offender to prove such offender's criminal history by a preponderance of the evidence." K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 21-6814(c); see also State v. Corby, 314 Kan. 793 , ___, 2022 WL 186579 , at * 3(No. 122,584, filed January 2 | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Obregon
green
2 sentences2022See K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 21-6814(a) ("The offender's criminal history shall be . . . determined by a preponderance of the evidence at the sentencing hearing by the sentencing judge."); State v. Obregon, 309 Kan. 1267, 1275 , 444 P.3d 331 (2019) (stating it is the State's burden to prove a defendant's criminal history). 2022See K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 21-6814(a) ("The offender's criminal history shall be . . . determined by a preponderance of the evidence at the sentencing hearing by the sentencing judge."); State v. Obregon, 309 Kan. 1267, 1275 , 444 P.3d 331 (2019) (stating it is the State's burden to prove a defendant's criminal history). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.