Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Vasquezgreen2 sentences2024See State v. Vasquez, 287 Kan. 40, 59 , 194 P.3d 563 (2008), Affirmed. 10 2024See State v. Vasquez, 287 Kan. 40, 59 , 194 P.3d 563 (2008), Affirmed. 10 | 2 | 2 |
State v. Hernandezgreen2 sentences2007See, e.g., State v. Hernandez, 284 Kan. 74, 97-98 , 159 P.3d 950 (2007); State v. Wise, 237 Kan. 117, 120 , 697 P.2d 1295 (1985); State v. Staab, 230 Kan. 329, 338 , 635 P.2d 257 (1981). 2007See, e.g., State v. Hernandez, 284 Kan. 74, 97-98 , 159 P.3d 950 (2007); State v. Wise, 237 Kan. 117, 120 , 697 P.2d 1295 (1985); State v. Staab, 230 Kan. 329, 338 , 635 P.2d 257 (1981). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Kellygreen2 sentences2016See Kelly, 298 Kan. at 975-76 . 2016See Kelly, 298 Kan. at 975-76 . 29 All of this being said, this court has since overruled Murdock in State v. Keel, 302 Kan. 560, 589 , 357 P.3d 251 (2015), and Fisher's illegal sentence claim therefore fails. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Keelgreen2 sentences2016See Kelly, 298 Kan. at 975-76 . 29 All of this being said, this court has since overruled Murdock in State v. Keel, 302 Kan. 560, 589 , 357 P.3d 251 (2015), and Fisher's illegal sentence claim therefore fails. 2016See Kelly, 298 Kan. at 975-76 . 29 All of this being said, this court has since overruled Murdock in State v. Keel, 302 Kan. 560, 589 , 357 P.3d 251 (2015), and Fisher's illegal sentence claim therefore fails. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wise
green
2 sentences2007See, e.g., State v. Hernandez, 284 Kan. 74, 97-98 , 159 P.3d 950 (2007); State v. Wise, 237 Kan. 117, 120 , 697 P.2d 1295 (1985); State v. Staab, 230 Kan. 329, 338 , 635 P.2d 257 (1981). 2007See, e.g., State v. Hernandez, 284 Kan. 74, 97-98 , 159 P.3d 950 (2007); State v. Wise, 237 Kan. 117, 120 , 697 P.2d 1295 (1985); State v. Staab, 230 Kan. 329, 338 , 635 P.2d 257 (1981). | 2 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Staab
green
2 sentences2007See, e.g., State v. Hernandez, 284 Kan. 74, 97-98 , 159 P.3d 950 (2007); State v. Wise, 237 Kan. 117, 120 , 697 P.2d 1295 (1985); State v. Staab, 230 Kan. 329, 338 , 635 P.2d 257 (1981). 2007See, e.g., State v. Hernandez, 284 Kan. 74, 97-98 , 159 P.3d 950 (2007); State v. Wise, 237 Kan. 117, 120 , 697 P.2d 1295 (1985); State v. Staab, 230 Kan. 329, 338 , 635 P.2d 257 (1981). | 2 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Davis
green
2 sentences2007We have since modified this Fisher rule slightly, holding that a declarant’s hearsay statement may be admitted into evidence under K.S.A. 60-460(a) either before or after the declarant testifies, see State v. Davis, 236 Kan. 538, 541 , 694 P.2d 418 (1985), but we have nevertheless consistently applied it in criminal cases. 2007We have since modified this Fisher rule slightly, holding that a declarant’s hearsay statement may be admitted into evidence under K.S.A. 60-460(a) either before or after the declarant testifies, see State v. Davis, 236 Kan. 538, 541 , 694 P.2d 418 (1985), but we have nevertheless consistently applied it in criminal cases. | 2 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Fisher
green
2 sentences2020We find no error by the district court and affirm its dismissal of Fisher's motion. 1 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The underlying facts leading to Fisher's conviction are detailed in Fisher's direct appeal, State v. Fisher, 304 Kan. 242 , 373 P.3d 781 (2016). 2020We find no error by the district court and affirm its dismissal of Fisher's motion. 1 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The underlying facts leading to Fisher's conviction are detailed in Fisher's direct appeal, State v. Fisher, 304 Kan. 242 , 373 P.3d 781 (2016). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Murdock
red
2 sentences2016After Fisher had filed his brief before the Court of Appeals, this court issued its opinion in State v. Murdock, 299 Kan. 312 , 323 P.3d 846 (2014), modified by Supreme Court order September 19, 2014, which supported Fisher's claim. 2016After Fisher had filed his brief before the Court of Appeals, this court issued its opinion in State v. Murdock, 299 Kan. 312 , 323 P.3d 846 (2014), modified by Supreme Court order September 19, 2014, which supported Fisher's claim. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.