Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2009–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Gonzalo Pereira-Munozgreen2 sentences2012This syllabus refers to “suspicions,” not “reasonable suspicion.” It was based on text in Morlock where our Supreme Court cited two cases from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, United States v. Barahona, 990 F.2d 412, 416 (8th Cir.1993), disapproved by United States v. Olivera-Mendez, 484 F.3d 505, 510 (8th Cir. 2007), and United States v. Pereira-Munoz, 59 F.3d 788, 791 (8th Cir. 1995). 289 Kan. at 996 . 2009When “the responses of the detainee and the circumstances give rise to suspicions unrelated to the traffic offense, an officer may broaden his inquiry and satisfy those suspicions.” United States v. Barahona, 990 F.2d 412, 416 (8th Cir. 1993); see also United States v. Pereira-Munoz, 59 F.3d 788, 791 (8th Cir. 1995) (When officers develop reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity during a traffic stop, they have “ ‘ “justification for a greater intrusion unrelated to the traffic offense” ’ ” and are “permitted To graduate their responses to the demands of their particular situatio | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Jose Leon Barahonagreen2 sentences2012This syllabus refers to “suspicions,” not “reasonable suspicion.” It was based on text in Morlock where our Supreme Court cited two cases from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, United States v. Barahona, 990 F.2d 412, 416 (8th Cir.1993), disapproved by United States v. Olivera-Mendez, 484 F.3d 505, 510 (8th Cir. 2007), and United States v. Pereira-Munoz, 59 F.3d 788, 791 (8th Cir. 1995). 289 Kan. at 996 . 2009When “the responses of the detainee and the circumstances give rise to suspicions unrelated to the traffic offense, an officer may broaden his inquiry and satisfy those suspicions.” United States v. Barahona, 990 F.2d 412, 416 (8th Cir. 1993); see also United States v. Pereira-Munoz, 59 F.3d 788, 791 (8th Cir. 1995) (When officers develop reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity during a traffic stop, they have “ ‘ “justification for a greater intrusion unrelated to the traffic offense” ’ ” and are “permitted To graduate their responses to the demands of their particular situatio | 2 | 2 |
State v. Morlockgreen2 sentences2022When "the responses of the detainee and the circumstances give rise to suspicions unrelated to the traffic offense, an officer may broaden his inquiry and satisfy those suspicions."'" State v. Schooler, 308 Kan. 333 , 346, 419 P.3d 1164 (2018) (quoting State v. Morlock, 289 Kan. 980, 996 , 218 P.3d 801 [2009]). 2018When 'the responses of the detainee and the circumstances give rise to suspicions unrelated to the traffic offense, an officer may broaden his inquiry and satisfy those suspicions .' " (Emphasis added.) Morlock , 289 Kan. at 996 , 218 P.3d 801 . | 1 | 4 |
In Re Holmberggreen2 sentences2022When "the responses of the detainee and the circumstances give rise to suspicions unrelated to the traffic offense, an officer may broaden his inquiry and satisfy those suspicions."'" State v. Schooler, 308 Kan. 333 , 346, 419 P.3d 1164 (2018) (quoting State v. Morlock, 289 Kan. 980, 996 , 218 P.3d 801 [2009]). 2018When 'the responses of the detainee and the circumstances give rise to suspicions unrelated to the traffic offense, an officer may broaden his inquiry and satisfy those suspicions .' " (Emphasis added.) Morlock , 289 Kan. at 996 , 218 P.3d 801 . | 1 | 3 |
State v. Colemangreen1 sentence2022When the detainee's responses and circumstances lead to suspicions unrelated to the traffic offense, an officer may broaden the inquiry and satisfy those suspicions."); Coleman, 292 Kan. at 816-17 (explaining that "an officer may expand the investigative detention beyond the purpose of the initial stop only if there is an objectively reasonable and articulable suspicion that criminal activity was or is taking place"). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Reyes Fabian Olivera-Mendezgreen1 sentence2012This syllabus refers to “suspicions,” not “reasonable suspicion.” It was based on text in Morlock where our Supreme Court cited two cases from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, United States v. Barahona, 990 F.2d 412, 416 (8th Cir.1993), disapproved by United States v. Olivera-Mendez, 484 F.3d 505, 510 (8th Cir. 2007), and United States v. Pereira-Munoz, 59 F.3d 788, 791 (8th Cir. 1995). 289 Kan. at 996 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Schooler
green
1 sentence2022When "the responses of the detainee and the circumstances give rise to suspicions unrelated to the traffic offense, an officer may broaden his inquiry and satisfy those suspicions."'" State v. Schooler, 308 Kan. 333 , 346, 419 P.3d 1164 (2018) (quoting State v. Morlock, 289 Kan. 980, 996 , 218 P.3d 801 [2009]). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.