somewhat similar claim in Kansas

2024In State v. Smith, 311 Kan. 109 , 456 P.3d 1004 (2020), the court rejected a somewhat similar claim when the defendant pled guilty to refusing to submit to an alcohol or drug test and driving while a habitual violator.

1976We considered a somewhat similar claim in Hendrix v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 203 Kan. 140 , 453 P.2d 486 .

1976We considered a somewhat similar claim in Hendrix v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 203 Kan. 140 , 453 P.2d 486 .

1959The other appears in In re Estate of Jones, 174 Kan. 506 , 257 P. 2d 116 , where, in disposing of a somewhat similar claim with respect to error in admission of evidence (see pages 514 and 515 of the opinion), it is held that when it does not affirmatively appear that a question raised on appeal was presented to and determined by the trial court, this court does not consider it on review.

1959The other appears in In re Estate of Jones, 174 Kan. 506 , 257 P. 2d 116 , where, in disposing of a somewhat similar claim with respect to error in admission of evidence (see pages 514 and 515 of the opinion), it is held that when it does not affirmatively appear that a question raised on appeal was presented to and determined by the trial court, this court does not consider it on review.

1954A somewhat similar claim was raised in' Smith v. Gore, 23 Kan. 488 , where it was held: “Where a person sells his homestead and does not at the time have any intention of rising the proceeds thereof in purchasing another homestead, and has no intention of purchasing another homestead immediately with any funds, such proceeds are not exempt from the payment of his debts.

1953Some of the last mentioned cases are reviewed by appellee but especial attention is given to Miller v. Bennett, 190 Va. 162 , 56 S.E.2d 217 , 21 A.L.R.2d 364 , from which extensive quotation is made.

1953Some of the last mentioned cases are reviewed by appellee but especial attention is given to Miller v. Bennett, 190 Va. 162 , 56 S.E.2d 217 , 21 A.L.R.2d 364 , from which extensive quotation is made.

1912Complaint is made of the eighth instruction, in which the jury were charged that in determining whether Lucy A. Putifer had sufficient mental capacity to execute the deeds in controversy or whether she was acting as the result of undue influence, they had a right to take into consideration her physical and mental condition, her relations to her children and the grantees in the deeds, “the nature of the transaction of executing said deeds, the reasonableness or unreasonableness of such deeds, and every other fact and circumstánce in evidence touching upon the question.” In Blodgett v. Yocum, 80

1912Complaint is made of the eighth instruction, in which the jury were charged that in determining whether Lucy A. Putifer had sufficient mental capacity to execute the deeds in controversy or whether she was acting as the result of undue influence, they had a right to take into consideration her physical and mental condition, her relations to her children and the grantees in the deeds, “the nature of the transaction of executing said deeds, the reasonableness or unreasonableness of such deeds, and every other fact and circumstánce in evidence touching upon the question.” In Blodgett v. Yocum, 80