Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wheeler & Clevenger Oil Co. v. Washburngreen2 sentences2011Wheeler and Clevenger Oil Co., Inc. v. Washburn, 127 S.W.3d 609, 614 (Ky.2004). 2007As noted by the appellees, resolution of this appeal is governed by - the “plain meaning rule” reiterated by the Supreme Court of Kentucky in Wheeler and Clevenger Oil Co., Inc. v. Washburn, 127 S.W.3d 609, 614 (Ky.2004): The most commonly stated rule in statutory interpretation is that the “plain meaning” of the statute controls. | 2 | 2 |
Executive Branch Ethics Commission v. Stephensgreen1 sentence2009Moreover, Kentucky courts have steadfastly adhered to the plain-meaning rule “unless to do so would constitute an absurd result.” Executive Branch Ethics Commission v. Stephens, 92 S.W.3d 69, 73 (Ky.2002). | 1 | 1 |
Western & Southern Life Insurance v. Webergreen2 sentences2004Co. v. Weber, 183 Ky. 32 , 209 S.W. 716 , 717 717 (1919) ("[N]o intention shall be read into the wording of the statute contrary to the plain meaning of the language employed."); BROWN & BROWN, supra note 21, § 4.2 ("The most commonly stated rule today is that the 'plain meaning' of the statute is to control. 2004Co. v. Weber, 183 Ky. 32 , 209 S.W. 716 , 717 717 (1919) ("[N]o intention shall be read into the wording of the statute contrary to the plain meaning of the language employed."); BROWN & BROWN, supra note 21, § 4.2 ("The most commonly stated rule today is that the 'plain meaning' of the statute is to control. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Alliance for Kentucky's Future, Inc. v. Environmental & Public Protection Cabinet
green
1 sentence2024Alliance for Kentucky’s Future, Inc. -9- v. Environmental and Public Protection Cabinet, 310 S.W.3d 681 (Ky. App. 2008). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Lamb v. Holmes
green
1 sentence2023Lamb v. Holmes, 162 S.W.3d 902 (Ky. 2005). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.