adequate determining principle (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

adequate determining principle in Louisiana

6 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
United States v. Carmack green
scotus · 1947
2 sentences

2018Thus, the only question before the trial court was whether Acadian, "in selecting the location and extent of the property to be expropriated, acted in bad faith or so capriciously or arbitrarily that its action was without an adequate determining principle or was unreasoned." Red River Waterway Comm'n v. Fredericks , 566 So.2d 79 , 83 (La.1990) (citing U.S. v. Carmack , 329 U.S. 230 , 67 S.Ct. 252 , 91 L.Ed. 209 (1946) ).

2018Thus, the only question before the trial court was whether Acadian, "in selecting the location and extent of the property to be expropriated, acted in bad faith or so capriciously or arbitrarily that its action was without an adequate determining principle or was unreasoned." Red River Waterway Comm'n v. Fredericks , 566 So.2d 79 , 83 (La.1990) (citing U.S. v. Carmack , 329 U.S. 230 , 67 S.Ct. 252 , 91 L.Ed. 209 (1946) ).

51990–2018
Red River Waterway Com'n v. Fredericks green
la · 1990
2 sentences

2018Thus, the only question before the trial court was whether Acadian, "in selecting the location and extent of the property to be expropriated, acted in bad faith or so capriciously or arbitrarily that its action was without an adequate determining principle or was unreasoned." Red River Waterway Comm'n v. Fredericks , 566 So.2d 79 , 83 (La.1990) (citing U.S. v. Carmack , 329 U.S. 230 , 67 S.Ct. 252 , 91 L.Ed. 209 (1946) ).

2018Thus, the only question before the trial court was whether Acadian, "in selecting the location and extent of the property to be expropriated, acted in bad faith or so capriciously or arbitrarily that its action was without an adequate determining principle or was unreasoned." Red River Waterway Comm'n v. Fredericks , 566 So.2d 79 , 83 (La.1990) (citing U.S. v. Carmack , 329 U.S. 230 , 67 S.Ct. 252 , 91 L.Ed. 209 (1946) ).

42004–2018
Recreation and Park Com'n v. C & S DEVELOPMENT, INC. green
la · 1998
1 sentence

2011An expropriator should consider “the availability of alternate sites, costs, 1 f,environmental factors, long-range planning, and safety considerations.” Recreation & Park Comm’n v. C & S Development, supra. The court found, however, that “once removed from the duty to negotiate, a pipeline company has virtually unassailable discretion.” The court agreed with the Nunleys that Acadian failed to preserve and produce “data such as designs, photographs, field notes, and con-structability studies,” but recognized that the supreme court has recently approved the use of testimonial evidence of the sit

12011–2011
CALCASIEU-CAMERON HOSP. SERV. v. Fontenot green
lactapp · 1993
1 sentence

1997Calcasieu-Cameron Hospital Service District v. Fontenot, 628 So.2d at 78-79 .

11997–1997

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 19:2 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

MI 18 (2012–2025) LA 6 (1990–2018) OH 3 (2008–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check