Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Danner v. MBNA America Bank, N.A.green2 sentences2011See Danner v. MBNA America Bank, NA, 369 Ark. 435 , 255 S.W.3d 863, 867 (2007) (The "time limits provided by section 12 . . . do not prevent a party who did not participate in an arbitration proceeding from challenging the validity of the award at the time of its enforcement on the basis that no written agreement to arbitrate existed between the parties"); MBNA America Bank, NA v. Christianson, 377 S.C. 210 , 659 S.E.2d 209, 212 (S.C.App.2008) ("MBNA could not rely on the debtor's tardiness in challenging the award if the arbitrator never had jurisdiction to arbitrate and enter an award . . . 2011See Danner v. MBNA America Bank, NA, 369 Ark. 435 , 255 S.W.3d 863, 867 (2007) (The "time limits provided by section 12 . . . do not prevent a party who did not participate in an arbitration proceeding from challenging the validity of the award at the time of its enforcement on the basis that no written agreement to arbitrate existed between the parties"); MBNA America Bank, NA v. Christianson, 377 S.C. 210 , 659 S.E.2d 209, 212 (S.C.App.2008) ("MBNA could not rely on the debtor's tardiness in challenging the award if the arbitrator never had jurisdiction to arbitrate and enter an award . . . | 1 | 1 |
MBNA America Bank, N.A. v. Christiansongreen2 sentences2011See Danner v. MBNA America Bank, NA, 369 Ark. 435 , 255 S.W.3d 863, 867 (2007) (The "time limits provided by section 12 . . . do not prevent a party who did not participate in an arbitration proceeding from challenging the validity of the award at the time of its enforcement on the basis that no written agreement to arbitrate existed between the parties"); MBNA America Bank, NA v. Christianson, 377 S.C. 210 , 659 S.E.2d 209, 212 (S.C.App.2008) ("MBNA could not rely on the debtor's tardiness in challenging the award if the arbitrator never had jurisdiction to arbitrate and enter an award . . . 2011See Danner v. MBNA America Bank, NA, 369 Ark. 435 , 255 S.W.3d 863, 867 (2007) (The "time limits provided by section 12 . . . do not prevent a party who did not participate in an arbitration proceeding from challenging the validity of the award at the time of its enforcement on the basis that no written agreement to arbitrate existed between the parties"); MBNA America Bank, NA v. Christianson, 377 S.C. 210 , 659 S.E.2d 209, 212 (S.C.App.2008) ("MBNA could not rely on the debtor's tardiness in challenging the award if the arbitrator never had jurisdiction to arbitrate and enter an award . . . | 1 | 1 |
Simpson v. Pep Boys-Manny Moe & Jack, Inc.green1 sentence2005See Simpson, 03-0358, p. 6-7, 847 So.2d at 622-23 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Aeneas Williams Imports, L.L.C. v. Carter
green
1 sentence2017In Aeneas Williams Impends, LLC v. Carter, 47,989 (La.App. 2 Cir. 12/13/12), 131 So.3d 894 , this court found that the trial court properly sustained the defendants’ exception of lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the evidence demonstrated the existence of a valid arbitration agreement. 11fiMuch of the evidence cited by Respondent in her opposition to this application is not part of the record for review, as it was not admitted into evidence at the hearing on Regions’ exceptions and motion. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp.
green
1 sentence2013Aguillard, supra, is the seminal case in this state addressing the validity of an arbitration agreement in a standard form contract under a “contract of adhesion” analysis. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
STANDARD CO., ETC. v. Elliott Const. Co., Inc.
green
1 sentence2001The court noted that "there is a significant legal and practical distinction between the validity of a contract ab initio... and the waiver of the right to enforce the arbitration agreement clause of a valid contract because of actions of a party after the contract was performed." Standard, 363 So.2d at 674 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Bartley, Inc. v. Jefferson Parish School Board
green
1 sentence1978The Court of Appeal in the instant case did not properly apply the holding of Bartley, Inc. v. Jefferson Parish School Board, supra. In Bartley the subcontractor and owner contended that the general contractor's demand for arbitration, pursuant to the same AIA arbitration agreement as the instant case, was premature because he had not referred the claim to the architect before making demand. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.