Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp.green2 sentences2013There was no argument in Coleman, supra, that the arbitration | inprovision was adhesionary and that case did not involve a contract of adhesion analysis as in Aguillard, supra. As stated in Aguillard , the real issue in a contract of adhesion analysis is one of consent— whether the “party truly consented to all the printed terms.” Aguillard , 04-2804, p. 12, 908 So.2d at 10 . 2013There was no argument in Coleman, supra, that the arbitration | inprovision was adhesionary and that case did not involve a contract of adhesion analysis as in Aguillard, supra. As stated in Aguillard , the real issue in a contract of adhesion analysis is one of consent— whether the “party truly consented to all the printed terms.” Aguillard , 04-2804, p. 12, 908 So.2d at 10 . | 2 | 5 |
Barcelona v. Sea Victory Maritime, Inc.green1 sentence1996See Barcelona v. Sea Victory Maritime, Inc., 619 So.2d 741 (La.App 4 Cir.1993), writ denied, 626 So.2d 1179 (La.1993). | 1 | 1 |
Barcelona v. Sea Victory Maritime, Inc.green1 sentence1996See Barcelona v. Sea Victory Maritime, Inc., 619 So.2d 741 (La.App 4 Cir.1993), writ denied, 626 So.2d 1179 (La.1993). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Coleman v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc.
green
1 sentence2013There was no argument in Coleman, supra, that the arbitration | inprovision was adhesionary and that case did not involve a contract of adhesion analysis as in Aguillard, supra. As stated in Aguillard , the real issue in a contract of adhesion analysis is one of consent— whether the “party truly consented to all the printed terms.” Aguillard , 04-2804, p. 12, 908 So.2d at 10 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.