Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kilpatrick v. Kilpatrickgreen1 sentence1980See Succession of Kilpatrick, 356 So.2d 1083 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1978), writ denied 359 So.2d 198 (La., June 2, 1978). 1 Although the record shows numerous pleadings filed thereafter relating to the administration of the succession, the record does not show any proceedings related to the petition to annul the will until September 25, 1979 when the district court issued an order setting a pretrial conference for October 11, 1979. | 1 | 1 |
Succession of Kilpatrickgreen1 sentence1980See Succession of Kilpatrick, 356 So.2d 1083 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1978), writ denied 359 So.2d 198 (La., June 2, 1978). 1 Although the record shows numerous pleadings filed thereafter relating to the administration of the succession, the record does not show any proceedings related to the petition to annul the will until September 25, 1979 when the district court issued an order setting a pretrial conference for October 11, 1979. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
green
1 sentence2024The peremptory exception raising the objection of no cause of action tests " the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords a remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading." Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc., 616 So. 2d at 1235 ; Labranche v. Landry, 2022- 0461 ( La. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Lejeune v. Rayne Branch Hosp.
green
1 sentence2017Therefore, according to the defendants, Da’Veion “did not have the requisite familial relationship with [Lavender] in order to recover for any emotional distress or mental anguish he suffered from witnessing her death.” | gf;Our review of this record reveals that in response to the plaintiffs petition for damages, the defendants filed a peremptory exception of “partial no cause of action,” arguing that the plaintiff was not within the class of persons who could assert a claim under LSA-C.C. art. 2315.6 and LeJeune v. Rayne Branch Hosp., 556 So.2d 559 (La. 1990). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Reese v. STATE DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
green
2 sentences2015Reese v. State Department of Public Safety and Corrections, 866 So.2d at 246 . 2015Reese v. State Department of Public Safety and Corrections, 866 So.2d at 246 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Berry v. Insurance Co. of North America
neutral
1 sentence1998App.2d Cir. 10/30/96), 683 So.2d 310 , writ denied 97-0091 (La.3/7/97), 689 So.2d 1374 . [2] The defendants filed a peremptory exception of res judicata in this court on June 24, 1997. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Berry v. Insurance Co. of North America
green
1 sentence1998App.2d Cir. 10/30/96), 683 So.2d 310 , writ denied 97-0091 (La.3/7/97), 689 So.2d 1374 . [2] The defendants filed a peremptory exception of res judicata in this court on June 24, 1997. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State Ex Rel. Armistead v. Phelps
green
1 sentence1979Armistead v. Phelps, 365 So.2d 468 (La. 1978). | 1 | 1979–1979 |