Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co.green2 sentences2011Because the overruling of a peremptory exception is an interlocutory order, “it is not binding upon the trial court when it timely — but later — determines error of judgment based upon the matter as submitted or upon subsequent disclosures in the record which require a contrary holding.” Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., 261 La. 1080 , 262 So.2d 328, 332 (La.1972). 2011Because the overruling of a peremptory exception is an interlocutory order, “it is not binding upon the trial court when it timely — but later — determines error of judgment based upon the matter as submitted or upon subsequent disclosures in the record which require a contrary holding.” Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., 261 La. 1080 , 262 So.2d 328, 332 (La.1972). | 1 | 2 |
Cochran v. Pelican Well Tool & Supply Co.green1 sentence2021See Peak Performance Physical Therapy & Fitness, LLC v. Hibernia Corp., 2007- 2206 5 La. | 1 | 1 |
Jarrell v. Cartergreen1 sentence2006Jarrell v. Carter, 577 So.2d 120, 124 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 582 So.2d 1311 (La.1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
La. State Bar Ass'n v. CARR AND ASSOCIATES
green
1 sentence2011“The overruling of a peremptory exception is merely an interlocutory order, and the court has the right, at any stage of the proceeding at which the objection was made, to set aside that decree and to sustain the exception, upon finding that it erred in overruling it.” Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Carr and Assocs., Inc., 08-2114, p. 6 (La.App. 1 Cir. 5/8/09), 15 So.3d 158, 164 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Jarrell v. Carter
green
1 sentence2006Jarrell v. Carter, 577 So.2d 120, 124 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 582 So.2d 1311 (La.1991). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Herlitz Const. Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc.
green
1 sentence1989Id. [Where the trial court denied defendant’s peremptory exception of no cause of action, and the court of appeal denied supervisory writs, the Supreme Court granted writs and remanded to the court of appeal for a decision on the merits]. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Register v. Harrell
green
2 sentences1980Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., supra ; Labourette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., 156 La. 412 , 100 So. 547 (1924); Register v. Harrell, 131 La. 983 , 60 So. 638 (1912). 1980Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., supra ; Labourette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., 156 La. 412 , 100 So. 547 (1924); Register v. Harrell, 131 La. 983 , 60 So. 638 (1912). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co.
green
2 sentences1980Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., supra ; Labourette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., 156 La. 412 , 100 So. 547 (1924); Register v. Harrell, 131 La. 983 , 60 So. 638 (1912). 1980Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., supra ; Labourette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., 156 La. 412 , 100 So. 547 (1924); Register v. Harrell, 131 La. 983 , 60 So. 638 (1912). | 1 | 1980–1980 |