class certification inquiry (Maryland) · Go Syfert
← Maryland issues

class certification inquiry in Maryland

6 Maryland opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2023 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Silver v. Greater Baltimore Med. Ctr. green
mdctspecapp · 2020
2 sentences

2023Silver v. Greater Baltimore Medical Center, 248 Md.

2023Silver v. Greater Baltimore Medical Center, 248 Md.

32023–2023
Creveling v. Government Employees Insurance green
md · 2003
2 sentences

2020This deferential posture “appropriately recognizes the factual nature of a class certification inquiry and a trial court’s power to manage its docket.” Id. (quoting Creveling, 376 Md. at 91 ).

2007Review of the circuit court’s determination for abuse of discretion “appropriately recognizes the factual nature of a class certification inquiry and a trial court’s power to manage its docket.” Id. at 91 , 828 A.2d 229 .

22007–2020
Cutler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. green
mdctspecapp · 2007
1 sentence

2020This deferential posture “appropriately recognizes the factual nature of a class certification inquiry and a trial court’s power to manage its docket.” Id. (quoting Creveling, 376 Md. at 91 ).

12020–2020
In re Eaton Vance Corp. Securities Litigation green
mad · 2004
1 sentence

2007Id. (quoting Eaton Vance, supra, 220 F.R.D. at 169-70 ).

12007–2007
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Noonan green
md · 1994
1 sentence

2007An appellate court may find an abuse of discretion when “no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the [trial] court, or when the court acts ‘without reference to any guiding rules or principles.’ ” In re Adoption/Guardianship No. 3598, 347 Md. 295, 312 , 701 A.2d 110 (1997) (quoting North v. North, 102 Md.App. 1, 13 , 648 A.2d 1025 (1994)(alter-ation in original)).

12007–2007
North v. North green
mdctspecapp · 1994
1 sentence

2007An appellate court may find an abuse of discretion when “no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the [trial] court, or when the court acts ‘without reference to any guiding rules or principles.’ ” In re Adoption/Guardianship No. 3598, 347 Md. 295, 312 , 701 A.2d 110 (1997) (quoting North v. North, 102 Md.App. 1, 13 , 648 A.2d 1025 (1994)(alter-ation in original)).

12007–2007
Robert La Mar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Company, Ronald J. Kinsling v. Allegheny Airlines green
ca9 · 1973
1 sentence

2007Id. (quoting Eaton Vance, supra, 220 F.R.D. at 169-70 ).

12007–2007
In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 3598 green
md · 1997
2 sentences

2007An appellate court may find an abuse of discretion when “no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the [trial] court, or when the court acts ‘without reference to any guiding rules or principles.’ ” In re Adoption/Guardianship No. 3598, 347 Md. 295, 312 , 701 A.2d 110 (1997) (quoting North v. North, 102 Md.App. 1, 13 , 648 A.2d 1025 (1994)(alter-ation in original)).

2007An appellate court may find an abuse of discretion when “no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the [trial] court, or when the court acts ‘without reference to any guiding rules or principles.’ ” In re Adoption/Guardianship No. 3598, 347 Md. 295, 312 , 701 A.2d 110 (1997) (quoting North v. North, 102 Md.App. 1, 13 , 648 A.2d 1025 (1994)(alter-ation in original)).

12007–2007

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MD § Md. Code Ann., Bus. Reg. § 7-101 (3) MD § Md. Code Ann., Com. Law § 14-201 (3) MD § Md. Code Ann., Real Prop. § 8-208 (3) MD § Md. Code Ann., Real Prop. § 8-401 (3) USC § 15u.s.c.1692 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 33 (2000–2024) TX 33 (1986–2023) OH 19 (1998–2022) AL 13 (1997–2018) PA 13 (1982–2023) LA 13 (1989–2015) KY 9 (2019–2025) FL 7 (2003–2021) MD 6 (2007–2023) MO 5 (2007–2020) WI 4 (1986–2026) GA 3 (2010–2020) NM 2 (2015–2015) MT 2 (2015–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check