inapplicability presumption in Maryland

6 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2010 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (15)

Case	Followed	Cited
Ellsworth v. Sherne Lingerie, Inc.green md · 1985 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010Ellsworth v. Sherne Lingerie, Inc., 303 Md. 581, 599-600 , 495 A.2d 348, 357 (1985) (indicating that judges determine when a negative instruction will be helpful and not harmful to the jury's deliberations). 64 In the present case, the instruction actually given by the trial judge did not reference assumption of risk nor the inapplicability of the doctrine to cases involving a FELA action. [9] Our task, therefore, is to determine whether the proposed instruction was applicable to the evidence presented at trial. 2010Ellsworth v. Sherne Lingerie, Inc., 303 Md. 581, 599-600 , 495 A.2d 348, 357 (1985) (indicating that judges determine when a negative instruction will be helpful and not harmful to the jury's deliberations). 64 In the present case, the instruction actually given by the trial judge did not reference assumption of risk nor the inapplicability of the doctrine to cases involving a FELA action. [9] Our task, therefore, is to determine whether the proposed instruction was applicable to the evidence presented at trial.	1	1
Lilly v. Commissioner of Internal Revenuegreen ca4 · 1951 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 1 sentence 1976In addition to establishing the inapplicability of the presumption of knowledge, these cases further shift the burden of proof on the question of knowledge from the dependent party to the dominant party. [16] 169 Md. 407, 410-11 , 182 A. 317, 318 (1935). [17] Gaver v. Gaver, 176 Md. 171, 185 , 4 A.2d 132, 139 (1939). [18] Tracey v. Tracey, 160 Md. 306, 318 , 153 A. 80, 85 (1931). [19] Williams, supra, 63 Md. at 404 (dissenting opinion); Todd, supra, 33 Md. at 194 . [20] Canterbury, supra, 464 F.2d at 782 ; Sheets v. Burman, 322 F.2d 277, 279 (5th Cir.1963); Lilly v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue,	1	1
Tracey v. Traceygreen md · 1931 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 2 sentences 1976In addition to establishing the inapplicability of the presumption of knowledge, these cases further shift the burden of proof on the question of knowledge from the dependent party to the dominant party. [16] 169 Md. 407, 410-11 , 182 A. 317, 318 (1935). [17] Gaver v. Gaver, 176 Md. 171, 185 , 4 A.2d 132, 139 (1939). [18] Tracey v. Tracey, 160 Md. 306, 318 , 153 A. 80, 85 (1931). [19] Williams, supra, 63 Md. at 404 (dissenting opinion); Todd, supra, 33 Md. at 194 . [20] Canterbury, supra, 464 F.2d at 782 ; Sheets v. Burman, 322 F.2d 277, 279 (5th Cir.1963); Lilly v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 1976In addition to establishing the inapplicability of the presumption of knowledge, these cases further shift the burden of proof on the question of knowledge from the dependent party to the dominant party. [16] 169 Md. 407, 410-11 , 182 A. 317, 318 (1935). [17] Gaver v. Gaver, 176 Md. 171, 185 , 4 A.2d 132, 139 (1939). [18] Tracey v. Tracey, 160 Md. 306, 318 , 153 A. 80, 85 (1931). [19] Williams, supra, 63 Md. at 404 (dissenting opinion); Todd, supra, 33 Md. at 194 . [20] Canterbury, supra, 464 F.2d at 782 ; Sheets v. Burman, 322 F.2d 277, 279 (5th Cir.1963); Lilly v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue,	1	1
Bollack v. Bollackgreen md · 1935 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 2 sentences 1976In addition to establishing the inapplicability of the presumption of knowledge, these cases further shift the burden of proof on the question of knowledge from the dependent party to the dominant party. . 169 Md. 407, 410-11 , 182 A. 317, 318 (1935). . 1976In addition to establishing the inapplicability of the presumption of knowledge, these cases further shift the burden of proof on the question of knowledge from the dependent party to the dominant party. . 169 Md. 407, 410-11 , 182 A. 317, 318 (1935). .	1	1
Gaver v. Gavergreen md · 1939 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 2 sentences 1976In addition to establishing the inapplicability of the presumption of knowledge, these cases further shift the burden of proof on the question of knowledge from the dependent party to the dominant party. [16] 169 Md. 407, 410-11 , 182 A. 317, 318 (1935). [17] Gaver v. Gaver, 176 Md. 171, 185 , 4 A.2d 132, 139 (1939). [18] Tracey v. Tracey, 160 Md. 306, 318 , 153 A. 80, 85 (1931). [19] Williams, supra, 63 Md. at 404 (dissenting opinion); Todd, supra, 33 Md. at 194 . [20] Canterbury, supra, 464 F.2d at 782 ; Sheets v. Burman, 322 F.2d 277, 279 (5th Cir.1963); Lilly v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 1976In addition to establishing the inapplicability of the presumption of knowledge, these cases further shift the burden of proof on the question of knowledge from the dependent party to the dominant party. [16] 169 Md. 407, 410-11 , 182 A. 317, 318 (1935). [17] Gaver v. Gaver, 176 Md. 171, 185 , 4 A.2d 132, 139 (1939). [18] Tracey v. Tracey, 160 Md. 306, 318 , 153 A. 80, 85 (1931). [19] Williams, supra, 63 Md. at 404 (dissenting opinion); Todd, supra, 33 Md. at 194 . [20] Canterbury, supra, 464 F.2d at 782 ; Sheets v. Burman, 322 F.2d 277, 279 (5th Cir.1963); Lilly v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue,	1	1
Williams v. Williamsgreen · 1885 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 1 sentence 1976In addition to establishing the inapplicability of the presumption of knowledge, these cases further shift the burden of proof on the question of knowledge from the dependent party to the dominant party. [16] 169 Md. 407, 410-11 , 182 A. 317, 318 (1935). [17] Gaver v. Gaver, 176 Md. 171, 185 , 4 A.2d 132, 139 (1939). [18] Tracey v. Tracey, 160 Md. 306, 318 , 153 A. 80, 85 (1931). [19] Williams, supra, 63 Md. at 404 (dissenting opinion); Todd, supra, 33 Md. at 194 . [20] Canterbury, supra, 464 F.2d at 782 ; Sheets v. Burman, 322 F.2d 277, 279 (5th Cir.1963); Lilly v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue,	1	1
Stacey v. Pantanogreen neb · 1964 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 2 sentences 1976Ohio 1965); Berkey v. Anderson, 1 Cal. App.3d 790 , 82 Cal. Rptr. 67, 77-78 (1970); Stacey v. Pantano, 177 Neb. 694 , 131 N.W.2d 163, 165 (1964); Demers v. Gerety, 87 N.M. 52 , 529 P.2d 278, 280 (1974); Allison v. Blewett, 348 S.W.2d 182, 184 (Tex.Civ.App. 1961); Hunter v. Brown, 4 Wash. App. 899 , 484 P.2d 1162, 1166 (1971); Mason v. Ellsworth, 3 Wash. App. 298 , 474 P.2d 909, 916 (1970); 41 Am. 1976Ohio 1965); Berkey v. Anderson, 1 Cal. App.3d 790 , 82 Cal. Rptr. 67, 77-78 (1970); Stacey v. Pantano, 177 Neb. 694 , 131 N.W.2d 163, 165 (1964); Demers v. Gerety, 87 N.M. 52 , 529 P.2d 278, 280 (1974); Allison v. Blewett, 348 S.W.2d 182, 184 (Tex.Civ.App. 1961); Hunter v. Brown, 4 Wash. App. 899 , 484 P.2d 1162, 1166 (1971); Mason v. Ellsworth, 3 Wash. App. 298 , 474 P.2d 909, 916 (1970); 41 Am.	1	1
Demers v. Geretygreen nmctapp · 1974 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 2 sentences 1976Ohio 1965); Berkey v. Anderson, 1 Cal. App.3d 790 , 82 Cal. Rptr. 67, 77-78 (1970); Stacey v. Pantano, 177 Neb. 694 , 131 N.W.2d 163, 165 (1964); Demers v. Gerety, 87 N.M. 52 , 529 P.2d 278, 280 (1974); Allison v. Blewett, 348 S.W.2d 182, 184 (Tex.Civ.App. 1961); Hunter v. Brown, 4 Wash. App. 899 , 484 P.2d 1162, 1166 (1971); Mason v. Ellsworth, 3 Wash. App. 298 , 474 P.2d 909, 916 (1970); 41 Am. 1976Ohio 1965); Berkey v. Anderson, 1 Cal. App.3d 790 , 82 Cal. Rptr. 67, 77-78 (1970); Stacey v. Pantano, 177 Neb. 694 , 131 N.W.2d 163, 165 (1964); Demers v. Gerety, 87 N.M. 52 , 529 P.2d 278, 280 (1974); Allison v. Blewett, 348 S.W.2d 182, 184 (Tex.Civ.App. 1961); Hunter v. Brown, 4 Wash. App. 899 , 484 P.2d 1162, 1166 (1971); Mason v. Ellsworth, 3 Wash. App. 298 , 474 P.2d 909, 916 (1970); 41 Am.	1	1
Hammonds v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Companygreen ohnd · 1965 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 1 sentence 1976In addition to establishing the inapplicability of the presumption of knowledge, these cases further shift the burden of proof on the question of knowledge from the dependent party to the dominant party. [16] 169 Md. 407, 410-11 , 182 A. 317, 318 (1935). [17] Gaver v. Gaver, 176 Md. 171, 185 , 4 A.2d 132, 139 (1939). [18] Tracey v. Tracey, 160 Md. 306, 318 , 153 A. 80, 85 (1931). [19] Williams, supra, 63 Md. at 404 (dissenting opinion); Todd, supra, 33 Md. at 194 . [20] Canterbury, supra, 464 F.2d at 782 ; Sheets v. Burman, 322 F.2d 277, 279 (5th Cir.1963); Lilly v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue,	1	1
Berkey v. Andersongreen calctapp · 1969 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 2 sentences 1976Ohio 1965); Berkey v. Anderson, 1 Cal. App.3d 790 , 82 Cal. Rptr. 67, 77-78 (1970); Stacey v. Pantano, 177 Neb. 694 , 131 N.W.2d 163, 165 (1964); Demers v. Gerety, 87 N.M. 52 , 529 P.2d 278, 280 (1974); Allison v. Blewett, 348 S.W.2d 182, 184 (Tex.Civ.App. 1961); Hunter v. Brown, 4 Wash. App. 899 , 484 P.2d 1162, 1166 (1971); Mason v. Ellsworth, 3 Wash. App. 298 , 474 P.2d 909, 916 (1970); 41 Am. 1976Ohio 1965); Berkey v. Anderson, 1 Cal. App.3d 790 , 82 Cal. Rptr. 67, 77-78 (1970); Stacey v. Pantano, 177 Neb. 694 , 131 N.W.2d 163, 165 (1964); Demers v. Gerety, 87 N.M. 52 , 529 P.2d 278, 280 (1974); Allison v. Blewett, 348 S.W.2d 182, 184 (Tex.Civ.App. 1961); Hunter v. Brown, 4 Wash. App. 899 , 484 P.2d 1162, 1166 (1971); Mason v. Ellsworth, 3 Wash. App. 298 , 474 P.2d 909, 916 (1970); 41 Am.	1	1
Hunter v. Browngreen washctapp · 1971 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 2 sentences 1976Ohio 1965); Berkey v. Anderson, 1 Cal. App.3d 790 , 82 Cal. Rptr. 67, 77-78 (1970); Stacey v. Pantano, 177 Neb. 694 , 131 N.W.2d 163, 165 (1964); Demers v. Gerety, 87 N.M. 52 , 529 P.2d 278, 280 (1974); Allison v. Blewett, 348 S.W.2d 182, 184 (Tex.Civ.App. 1961); Hunter v. Brown, 4 Wash. App. 899 , 484 P.2d 1162, 1166 (1971); Mason v. Ellsworth, 3 Wash. App. 298 , 474 P.2d 909, 916 (1970); 41 Am. 1976Ohio 1965); Berkey v. Anderson, 1 Cal. App.3d 790 , 82 Cal. Rptr. 67, 77-78 (1970); Stacey v. Pantano, 177 Neb. 694 , 131 N.W.2d 163, 165 (1964); Demers v. Gerety, 87 N.M. 52 , 529 P.2d 278, 280 (1974); Allison v. Blewett, 348 S.W.2d 182, 184 (Tex.Civ.App. 1961); Hunter v. Brown, 4 Wash. App. 899 , 484 P.2d 1162, 1166 (1971); Mason v. Ellsworth, 3 Wash. App. 298 , 474 P.2d 909, 916 (1970); 41 Am.	1	1
Mary Sheets v. Richard G. Burmangreen ca5 · 1963 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 1 sentence 1976In addition to establishing the inapplicability of the presumption of knowledge, these cases further shift the burden of proof on the question of knowledge from the dependent party to the dominant party. [16] 169 Md. 407, 410-11 , 182 A. 317, 318 (1935). [17] Gaver v. Gaver, 176 Md. 171, 185 , 4 A.2d 132, 139 (1939). [18] Tracey v. Tracey, 160 Md. 306, 318 , 153 A. 80, 85 (1931). [19] Williams, supra, 63 Md. at 404 (dissenting opinion); Todd, supra, 33 Md. at 194 . [20] Canterbury, supra, 464 F.2d at 782 ; Sheets v. Burman, 322 F.2d 277, 279 (5th Cir.1963); Lilly v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue,	1	1
Mason v. Ellsworthgreen washctapp · 1970 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 2 sentences 1976Ohio 1965); Berkey v. Anderson, 1 Cal. App.3d 790 , 82 Cal. Rptr. 67, 77-78 (1970); Stacey v. Pantano, 177 Neb. 694 , 131 N.W.2d 163, 165 (1964); Demers v. Gerety, 87 N.M. 52 , 529 P.2d 278, 280 (1974); Allison v. Blewett, 348 S.W.2d 182, 184 (Tex.Civ.App. 1961); Hunter v. Brown, 4 Wash. App. 899 , 484 P.2d 1162, 1166 (1971); Mason v. Ellsworth, 3 Wash. App. 298 , 474 P.2d 909, 916 (1970); 41 Am. 1976Ohio 1965); Berkey v. Anderson, 1 Cal. App.3d 790 , 82 Cal. Rptr. 67, 77-78 (1970); Stacey v. Pantano, 177 Neb. 694 , 131 N.W.2d 163, 165 (1964); Demers v. Gerety, 87 N.M. 52 , 529 P.2d 278, 280 (1974); Allison v. Blewett, 348 S.W.2d 182, 184 (Tex.Civ.App. 1961); Hunter v. Brown, 4 Wash. App. 899 , 484 P.2d 1162, 1166 (1971); Mason v. Ellsworth, 3 Wash. App. 298 , 474 P.2d 909, 916 (1970); 41 Am.	1	1
Allison v. Blewettgreen texapp · 1961 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 1 sentence 1976Ohio 1965); Berkey v. Anderson, 1 Cal. App.3d 790 , 82 Cal. Rptr. 67, 77-78 (1970); Stacey v. Pantano, 177 Neb. 694 , 131 N.W.2d 163, 165 (1964); Demers v. Gerety, 87 N.M. 52 , 529 P.2d 278, 280 (1974); Allison v. Blewett, 348 S.W.2d 182, 184 (Tex.Civ.App. 1961); Hunter v. Brown, 4 Wash. App. 899 , 484 P.2d 1162, 1166 (1971); Mason v. Ellsworth, 3 Wash. App. 298 , 474 P.2d 909, 916 (1970); 41 Am.	1	1
People Ex Rel. Keith v. Keithgreen ill · 1967 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1975–1975 2 sentences 1975Cf., e.g., People v. Keith, 38 Ill. 2d 405 , 231 N.E.2d 387, 390 (1967), suggesting the inapplicability of the privilege under such circumstances. . 1975Cf., e.g., People v. Keith, 38 Ill. 2d 405 , 231 N.E.2d 387, 390 (1967), suggesting the inapplicability of the privilege under such circumstances. .	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

Case	Cited	Years
Baltimore Gas and Electric Company v. BALTIMORE STEAM COMPANY green md · 1999 1 sentence 2003A more recent opinion of this Court applying the holding of the Bunting case to an appeal of an interlocutory order rejecting an immunity claim is Shoemaker v. Smith, 353 Md. 143 , 725 A.2d 549 (1999).	1	2003–2003
Shoemaker v. Smith green md · 1999 1 sentence 2003A more recent opinion of this Court applying the holding of the Bunting case to an appeal of an interlocutory order rejecting an immunity claim is Shoemaker v. Smith, 353 Md. 143 , 725 A.2d 549 (1999).	1	2003–2003
State v. Jett green md · 1989 2 sentences 2003A majority of the Court in Jett also purported to draw a distinction between (1) a defense of sovereign immunity grounded upon the inapplicability of a waiver of immunity statute, thereby leaving common law sovereign immunity intact, and (2) a defense of “common law sovereign immunity in its full, unrestricted vigor.” 316 Md. at 255 , 558 A.2d at 388 . 2003A majority of the Court in Jett also purported to draw a distinction between (1) a defense of sovereign immunity grounded upon the inapplicability of a waiver of immunity statute, thereby leaving common law sovereign immunity intact, and (2) a defense of “common law sovereign immunity in its full, unrestricted vigor.” 316 Md. at 255 , 558 A.2d at 388 .	1	2003–2003
MacKall v. State green md · 1978 2 sentences 1985Id. at 111, 387 A.2d 762 . 1985Id. at 111, 387 A.2d 762 .	1	1985–1985
Lilly v. Commissioner green scotus · 1952 1 sentence 1976In addition to establishing the inapplicability of the presumption of knowledge, these cases further shift the burden of proof on the question of knowledge from the dependent party to the dominant party. [16] 169 Md. 407, 410-11 , 182 A. 317, 318 (1935). [17] Gaver v. Gaver, 176 Md. 171, 185 , 4 A.2d 132, 139 (1939). [18] Tracey v. Tracey, 160 Md. 306, 318 , 153 A. 80, 85 (1931). [19] Williams, supra, 63 Md. at 404 (dissenting opinion); Todd, supra, 33 Md. at 194 . [20] Canterbury, supra, 464 F.2d at 782 ; Sheets v. Burman, 322 F.2d 277, 279 (5th Cir.1963); Lilly v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue,	1	1976–1976
Todd v. Grove green md · 1870 2 sentences 1976In addition to establishing the inapplicability of the presumption of knowledge, these cases further shift the burden of proof on the question of knowledge from the dependent party to the dominant party. [16] 169 Md. 407, 410-11 , 182 A. 317, 318 (1935). [17] Gaver v. Gaver, 176 Md. 171, 185 , 4 A.2d 132, 139 (1939). [18] Tracey v. Tracey, 160 Md. 306, 318 , 153 A. 80, 85 (1931). [19] Williams, supra, 63 Md. at 404 (dissenting opinion); Todd, supra, 33 Md. at 194 . [20] Canterbury, supra, 464 F.2d at 782 ; Sheets v. Burman, 322 F.2d 277, 279 (5th Cir.1963); Lilly v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 1976In addition to establishing the inapplicability of the presumption of knowledge, these cases further shift the burden of proof on the question of knowledge from the dependent party to the dominant party. [16] 169 Md. 407, 410-11 , 182 A. 317, 318 (1935). [17] Gaver v. Gaver, 176 Md. 171, 185 , 4 A.2d 132, 139 (1939). [18] Tracey v. Tracey, 160 Md. 306, 318 , 153 A. 80, 85 (1931). [19] Williams, supra, 63 Md. at 404 (dissenting opinion); Todd, supra, 33 Md. at 194 . [20] Canterbury, supra, 464 F.2d at 782 ; Sheets v. Burman, 322 F.2d 277, 279 (5th Cir.1963); Lilly v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue,	1	1976–1976
Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body Corporate green cadc · 1972 1 sentence 1976In addition to establishing the inapplicability of the presumption of knowledge, these cases further shift the burden of proof on the question of knowledge from the dependent party to the dominant party. [16] 169 Md. 407, 410-11 , 182 A. 317, 318 (1935). [17] Gaver v. Gaver, 176 Md. 171, 185 , 4 A.2d 132, 139 (1939). [18] Tracey v. Tracey, 160 Md. 306, 318 , 153 A. 80, 85 (1931). [19] Williams, supra, 63 Md. at 404 (dissenting opinion); Todd, supra, 33 Md. at 194 . [20] Canterbury, supra, 464 F.2d at 782 ; Sheets v. Burman, 322 F.2d 277, 279 (5th Cir.1963); Lilly v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue,	1	1976–1976
Kansas City Live Stock Commission Co. v. Bank of Hamlin neutral kan · 1909 2 sentences 1974In a case involving a factual and legal situation similar to that which faced the appellee Bank in the present case, the Supreme Court of Kansas, in Kansas City v. Bank of Hamlin, 79 Kan. 761 , 101 P. 617 , discussed the inapplicability of the doctrine of election of remedies, at 101 P. 618 : “The only question presented is whether or not the holder of a chattel mortgage can proceed by attachment to collect his debt, without waiving the mortgage security. 1974In a case involving a factual and legal situation similar to that which faced the appellee Bank in the present case, the Supreme Court of Kansas, in Kansas City v. Bank of Hamlin, 79 Kan. 761 , 101 P. 617 , discussed the inapplicability of the doctrine of election of remedies, at 101 P. 618 : “The only question presented is whether or not the holder of a chattel mortgage can proceed by attachment to collect his debt, without waiving the mortgage security.	1	1974–1974

Where else courts name it

CA 18 (1948–2025) NY 16 (1942–2022) IL 10 (1951–2024) PA 10 (1893–2023) CO 8 (1905–2019) TX 8 (1915–2015) FL 8 (1969–2014) LA 6 (1922–1998) MD 6 (1974–2010) MO 6 (1883–2002) MI 5 (1923–2019) OK 4 (1949–1989) AL 4 (1995–2016) NJ 4 (1989–2021) TN 4 (1954–2018) SC 4 (1986–2007) WV 4 (1909–1992) IN 3 (1882–2018) MA 3 (2003–2007) NC 3 (1951–2014) OH 3 (1952–2021) MT 3 (1937–1994) DC 3 (1974–1996) MN 3 (1910–2024) OR 2 (1945–1984) WY 2 (1991–1991) HI 2 (1963–1963) NM 2 (1991–1998)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check