6 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gill v. Ripleygreen2 sentences2021See id. at 770 , 724 A.2d at 96 . 2021See id. at 770 , 724 A.2d at 96 . | 1 | 3 |
Imbler v. Pachtmangreen2 sentences1997Although Imbler v. Pachtman was a case in which the prosecutorial immunity in question was of the absolute variety, the opinion was careful to point out that there may well be other prosecutorial functions which enjoy only qualified immunity: It remains to delineate the boundaries of our holding ... [T]he Court of Appeals emphasized that each of respon *309 dent’s challenged activities was an “integral part of the judicial process.” The purpose of the Court of Appeals’ focus upon the functional nature of the activities rather than respondent’s status was to distinguish and leave standing those 1997Although Imbler v. Pachtman was a case in which the prosecutorial immunity in question was of the absolute variety, the opinion was careful to point out that there may well be other prosecutorial functions which enjoy only qualified immunity: It remains to delineate the boundaries of our holding ... [T]he Court of Appeals emphasized that each of respon *309 dent’s challenged activities was an “integral part of the judicial process.” The purpose of the Court of Appeals’ focus upon the functional nature of the activities rather than respondent’s status was to distinguish and leave standing those | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Burns v. Reed
green
2 sentences2015That doctrine developed largely in the American courts.” Gill v. Ripley, 352 Md. 754, 764 , 724 A.2d 88 (1999) (citing Burns v. Reed, 500 U.S. 478, 493 , 111 S.Ct. 1934 , 114 L.Ed.2d 547 (1991)). 2015That doctrine developed largely in the American courts.” Gill v. Ripley, 352 Md. 754, 764 , 724 A.2d 88 (1999) (citing Burns v. Reed, 500 U.S. 478, 493 , 111 S.Ct. 1934 , 114 L.Ed.2d 547 (1991)). | 2 | 1999–2015 |
Oregon v. Kennedy
green
2 sentences2005Our analysis in Tabbs was picked up and became the heart of the State of Oregon’s ultimately successful brief in Oregon v. Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667 , 102 S.Ct. 2083 , 72 L.Ed.2d 416 (1982). *337 Oregon v. Kennedy The prosecutorial error that provoked the defense motion and the ultimate declaration of a mistrial in Oregon v. Kennedy was infinitely more egregious and more prejudicial than the pallid error, if error it was, in the case at bar. 2005Our analysis in Tabbs was picked up and became the heart of the State of Oregon’s ultimately successful brief in Oregon v. Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667 , 102 S.Ct. 2083 , 72 L.Ed.2d 416 (1982). *337 Oregon v. Kennedy The prosecutorial error that provoked the defense motion and the ultimate declaration of a mistrial in Oregon v. Kennedy was infinitely more egregious and more prejudicial than the pallid error, if error it was, in the case at bar. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.