non-testimonial hearing (Maine) · Go Syfert
← Maine issues

non-testimonial hearing in Maine

6 Maine opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maine courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Connorgreen
me · 2009 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
2 sentences

2024See State v. Connor, 2009 ME 91, ¶ 9 , 977 A.2d 1003 ; State v. Oullette, 2024 ME 29, ¶ 2 , 314 A.3d 253 . [¶4] During jury selection on May 13, 2021, Rosario’s counsel indicated that he wanted to voir dire Juror 23.

2024See State v. Connor, 2009 ME 91, ¶ 9 , 977 A.2d 1003 ; State v. Oullette, 2024 ME 29, ¶ 2 , 314 A.3d 253 . [¶4] During jury selection on May 13, 2021, Rosario’s counsel indicated that he wanted to voir dire Juror 23.

11
Robert M.A. Nadeau v. Lynnann Frydrychgreen
me · 2014 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
2 sentences

2020P. 1; Merrifield v. Hadlock, 2009 ME 1, ¶ 6 , 961 A.2d 1107 (“[T]he overall purpose of the Rules of Civil Procedure . . . is to ensure the speedy and inexpensive resolution of a case.”). [¶9] This conclusion is consistent with our decision in Nadeau v. Frydrych, in which the trial court dismissed a protection from harassment complaint on Rule 12(b)(6) grounds “after a non-testimonial hearing.” 2014 ME 154, ¶¶ 1, 4 , 108 A.3d 1254 .

2020P. 1; Merrifield v. Hadlock, 2009 ME 1, ¶ 6 , 961 A.2d 1107 (“[T]he overall purpose of the Rules of Civil Procedure . . . is to ensure the speedy and inexpensive resolution of a case.”). [¶9] This conclusion is consistent with our decision in Nadeau v. Frydrych, in which the trial court dismissed a protection from harassment complaint on Rule 12(b)(6) grounds “after a non-testimonial hearing.” 2014 ME 154, ¶¶ 1, 4 , 108 A.3d 1254 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maine. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
State of Maine v. Roger Ouellette green
me · 2024
1 sentence

2024See State v. Connor, 2009 ME 91, ¶ 9 , 977 A.2d 1003 ; State v. Oullette, 2024 ME 29, ¶ 2 , 314 A.3d 253 . [¶4] During jury selection on May 13, 2021, Rosario’s counsel indicated that he wanted to voir dire Juror 23.

12024–2024
Concord General Mutual Insurance v. Northern Assurance Co. green
me · 1992
1 sentence

2021Id. at 471-72 .

12021–2021
Merrifield v. Hadlock green
me · 2009
2 sentences

2020P. 1; Merrifield v. Hadlock, 2009 ME 1, ¶ 6 , 961 A.2d 1107 (“[T]he overall purpose of the Rules of Civil Procedure . . . is to ensure the speedy and inexpensive resolution of a case.”). [¶9] This conclusion is consistent with our decision in Nadeau v. Frydrych, in which the trial court dismissed a protection from harassment complaint on Rule 12(b)(6) grounds “after a non-testimonial hearing.” 2014 ME 154, ¶¶ 1, 4 , 108 A.3d 1254 .

2020P. 1; Merrifield v. Hadlock, 2009 ME 1, ¶ 6 , 961 A.2d 1107 (“[T]he overall purpose of the Rules of Civil Procedure . . . is to ensure the speedy and inexpensive resolution of a case.”). [¶9] This conclusion is consistent with our decision in Nadeau v. Frydrych, in which the trial court dismissed a protection from harassment complaint on Rule 12(b)(6) grounds “after a non-testimonial hearing.” 2014 ME 154, ¶¶ 1, 4 , 108 A.3d 1254 .

12020–2020
Pettinelli v. Yost green
me · 2007
2 sentences

2017Citing 19-A M.R.S. § 951-A(9) and Pettinelli v. Yost, 2007 ME 121, ¶ 19 , 930 A.2d 1074 , the court concluded that Johnson’s obligation to pay spousal support had ceased on February 29, 2016, and that Quinty’s “belated attempt to reinstate spousal support” was barred by both statute and case law.

2017Citing 19-A M.R.S. § 951-A(9) and Pettinelli v. Yost, 2007 ME 121, ¶ 19 , 930 A.2d 1074 , the court concluded that Johnson’s obligation to pay spousal support had ceased on February 29, 2016, and that Quinty’s “belated attempt to reinstate spousal support” was barred by both statute and case law.

12017–2017
Ramsey v. Baxter Title Co. green
me · 2012
2 sentences

2014Reviewing the legal 'sufficiency of the dismissed complaint de novo and in the light most favorable to Nadeau, see Ramsey v. Baxter Title Co., 2012 ME 113, ¶ 6 , 54 A.3d 710 , we conclude that Nadeau alleged sufficient facts to entitle him to seek relief pursuant to section 4651 (2)(A).

2014Reviewing the legal 'sufficiency of the dismissed complaint de novo and in the light most favorable to Nadeau, see Ramsey v. Baxter Title Co., 2012 ME 113, ¶ 6 , 54 A.3d 710 , we conclude that Nadeau alleged sufficient facts to entitle him to seek relief pursuant to section 4651 (2)(A).

12014–2014
Jenkins, Inc. v. Walsh Bros., Inc. green
me · 2001
1 sentence

2002We instructed that “[i]f the court finds that Jenkins failed to establish a violation of the statute, Jenkins has not prevailed ‘within the scope of [prompt payment statute],’ and accordingly, the court may not award attorney fees.” Id. ¶ 32, 776 A.2d at 1240 . [¶ 4] On remand, the court held a non-testimonial hearing and entered judgment for Jenkins and against - Walsh Brothers and Aetna.

12002–2002

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check