Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 2019–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. Gavin
green
2 sentences2024This Court also will consider “whether the [arbitrator’s] award rests upon an error of law of such materiality that it can be said the arbitrators exceeded their powers,” but we “will not set aside an arbitration award unless the arbitrator committed legal error, ‘and that, but for such error, a substantially different award must have been made.’ ” Kilpatrick v Lansing Community College, ___ Mich App ___, ___; ___ NW3d ___ (2023) (Docket No. 361300); slip op at 3, quoting DAIIE v Gavin, 416 Mich 407, 433 ; 331 NW2d 418 (1982). 2024This Court also will consider “whether the [arbitrator’s] award rests upon an error of law of such materiality that it can be said the arbitrators exceeded their powers,” but we “will not set aside an arbitration award unless the arbitrator committed legal error, ‘and that, but for such error, a substantially different award must have been made.’ ” Kilpatrick v Lansing Community College, ___ Mich App ___, ___; ___ NW3d ___ (2023) (Docket No. 361300); slip op at 3, quoting DAIIE v Gavin, 416 Mich 407, 433 ; 331 NW2d 418 (1982). | 4 | 2021–2024 |
Janet Lashar Eppel v. Christopher James Eppel
green
2 sentences2025Eppel v Eppel, 322 Mich App 562, 572 ; 912 NW2d 584 (2018). 2025Eppel v Eppel, 322 Mich App 562, 572 ; 912 NW2d 584 (2018). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Saveski v. Tiseo Architects, Inc.
green
2 sentences2021Id. at 443 ; Saveski v Tiseo Architects, Inc, 261 Mich App 553, 554-555 ; 682 NW2d 542 (2004). 2021Id. at 443 ; Saveski v Tiseo Architects, Inc, 261 Mich App 553, 554-555 ; 682 NW2d 542 (2004). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Hecht v. National Heritage Academies, Inc
green
2 sentences2019While relying on Hecht v Nat’l Heritage Academies, Inc, 499 Mich 586 ; 886 NW2d 135 (2016), plaintiff also argues that the arbitrator committed legal error when he failed to recognize that there are more than two ways a plaintiff can prove discrimination. 2019While relying on Hecht v Nat’l Heritage Academies, Inc, 499 Mich 586 ; 886 NW2d 135 (2016), plaintiff also argues that the arbitrator committed legal error when he failed to recognize that there are more than two ways a plaintiff can prove discrimination. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.