business relationship claim (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

business relationship claim in Michigan

6 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2023 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Health Call of Detroit v. Atrium Home & Health Care Services, Incgreen
michctapp · 2005 · cited in 2 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017See Health Call of Detroit v Atrium Home & Health Care Servs, Inc, 268 Mich App 83, 89 ; 706 NW2d 843 (2005). -7- In sum, the CBA governed in this case and the CBA provided that the voluntary retirement age was 50.

2017See Health Call of Detroit v Atrium Home & Health Care Servs, Inc, 268 Mich App 83, 89 ; 706 NW2d 843 (2005). -7- In sum, the CBA governed in this case and the CBA provided that the voluntary retirement age was 50.

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
CMI International, Inc. v. Intermet International Corp. green
michctapp · 2002
2 sentences

2023A tortious interference with a business relationship claim requires an allegation “of a per se wrongful act or the doing of a lawful act with malice and unjustified in law for the purpose of invading the contractual rights or the business relationship of another.” CMI Int’l, Inc v Intermet Int’l Corp, 251 Mich App 125, 131 ; 649 NW2d 808 (2002) (quotation marks and citation omitted).

2023A tortious interference with a business relationship claim requires an allegation “of a per se wrongful act or the doing of a lawful act with malice and unjustified in law for the purpose of invading the contractual rights or the business relationship of another.” CMI Int’l, Inc v Intermet Int’l Corp, 251 Mich App 125, 131 ; 649 NW2d 808 (2002) (quotation marks and citation omitted).

32022–2023
Wurtz v. Beecher Metropolitan District green
mich · 2014
2 sentences

2015See MCL 15.362; Wurtz v Beecher Metro Dist, 495 Mich 242 , 250-251 & n 14; 848 NW2d 121 (2014).

2015See MCL 15.362; Wurtz v Beecher Metro Dist, 495 Mich 242 , 250-251 & n 14; 848 NW2d 121 (2014).

12015–2015

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 15.361 (3) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 15.362 (3) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.3101 (3) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.3104 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

MI 6 (2015–2023) OH 3 (2006–2018) IN 3 (2005–2012) TN 2 (2011–2014) CT 2 (2019–2019) DE 2 (2021–2022) PA 2 (2011–2014) CA 2 (2007–2009)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check