Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1922–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ghaffari v. Turner Construction Co.
green
2 sentences2018The Ghaffari Court held that "the open and obvious doctrine and the common work area doctrine are incompatible." Ghaffari, 473 Mich. at 23 , 699 N.W.2d 687 . 2018The Ghaffari Court held that "the open and obvious doctrine and the common work area doctrine are incompatible." Ghaffari, 473 Mich. at 23 , 699 N.W.2d 687 . | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Altman v. Nelson
green
2 sentences2017The case involved a claim arising under the Paternity Act and “subject-matter jurisdiction over paternity actions has been conferred by statute on the circuit court.” Altman, 197 Mich App at 473 . 2017The case involved a claim arising under the Paternity Act and “subject-matter jurisdiction over paternity actions has been conferred by statute on the circuit court.” Altman, 197 Mich App at 473 . | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Douglas v. Edgewater Park Co.
green
2 sentences1978For example, in Douglas v Edgewater Park Co, 369 Mich 320 ; 119 NW2d 567 (1963), the case involved a claim of violation of a fire regulation promulgated under a state statute. 1978For example, in Douglas v Edgewater Park Co, 369 Mich 320 ; 119 NW2d 567 (1963), the case involved a claim of violation of a fire regulation promulgated under a state statute. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Ginsberg v. Wabash Railway Co.
green
1 sentence1922In the original opinion ( 219 Mich. 665 ) the case was held properly submitted to a jury on the theory that the terminal carrier was presumptively liable for damages to the consignment resulting from negligence during transportation from the initial point. | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.