Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1934–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of North Muskegon v. Millergreen2 sentences2010Village of Terrace Park v. Errett [ 12 F.2d 240 (C.A.6, 1926)]. [ Id. at 57 , 227 N.W. 743 .] [3] In defining the applicable test, Miller stated that "a zoning ordinance [must] be reasonable, and the reasonableness becomes the test of its legality." Id. 2010Village of Terrace Park v. Errett [12 F2d 240 (CA 6, 1926)]. [Id. at 57.][ 3 ] In defining the applicable test, Miller stated that “a zoning ordinance [must] be reasonable, and the reasonableness becomes the test of its legality.” Id. | 1 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Village of Terrace Park v. Errett
green
2 sentences2010Village of Terrace Park v. Errett [ 12 F.2d 240 (C.A.6, 1926)]. [ Id. at 57 , 227 N.W. 743 .] [3] In defining the applicable test, Miller stated that "a zoning ordinance [must] be reasonable, and the reasonableness becomes the test of its legality." Id. 2010Village of Terrace Park v. Errett [ 12 F.2d 240 (C.A.6, 1926)]. [ Id. at 57 , 227 N.W. 743 .] [3] In defining the applicable test, Miller stated that "a zoning ordinance [must] be reasonable, and the reasonableness becomes the test of its legality." Id. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
City of Pleasant Ridge v. Cooper
green
1 sentence1937We held in City of Pleasant Ridge v. Cooper, 267 Mich. 603, 606 , that a zoning ordinance must be reasonable “and the reasonableness becomes the test of its legality. ’ ’ While appellees state in their brief that ‘ ‘ thus far in our argument, we have considered that the question of what constitutes ‘structural alterations’ is one of law,” they also call attention to 1 Comp. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
James S. Holden Co. v. Connor
neutral
1 sentence1934Where the village of Grosse Pointe had by a like ordinance imposed a setback on certain corner lots, while exempting others in the district, Mr. Justice Fead, writing for the majority in James S. Holden Co. v. Connor, supra, held the exemption to be arbi *607 trary, discriminatory and not based upon tbe general welfare. | 1 | 1934–1934 |