inadequate waiver (Minnesota) · Go Syfert
← Minnesota issues

inadequate waiver in Minnesota

6 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re the Welfare of U.S.green
minnctapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024Thus, given the district court’s “considerable discretion in determining whether a juvenile should be certified for adult prosecution,” In re Welfare of U.S., 612 N.W.2d 192, 194 (Minn. App. 2000) (quotation omitted), a remand is appropriate to allow the district court to make findings consistent with the correct legal standards in the first instance.

11
State v. Garibaldigreen
minnctapp · 2007 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024See State v. Garibaldi, 726 N.W.2d 823 , 826–31 (Minn. App. 2007) (collecting cases).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Griller green
minn · 1998
1 sentence

2015To meet the third requirement—that the error affected his substantial rights—Pollard must show that the inadequate waiver “was prejudicial and affected the outcome of the case.” Griller, 583 N.W.2d at 741 .

12015–2015
Ralph M. Johnson v. Niagara MacHine & Tool Works, a New York Corporation green
ca8 · 1981
1 sentence

1993However, the court noted that “the present case does not involve an inadequate warning, or no warning at all.” Id. at 1226 n. 3 (citations omitted).

11993–1993
Johnson v. City of Plymouth green
minn · 1978
1 sentence

1993Id.

11993–1993
State v. Stewart green
minnctapp · 1985
1 sentence

1985In State v. Stewart, 360 N.W.2d 463 (Minn.Ct.App.1985), the defendant was given a group advisory of his constitutional rights.

11985–1985

Where else courts name it

CA 43 (1954–2026) NJ 33 (1979–2026) IL 29 (1981–2026) OH 22 (1991–2024) WA 21 (1972–2025) PA 21 (1938–2025) FL 19 (1974–2026) MS 17 (1993–2017) TX 17 (1971–2021) ME 14 (1983–2018) CT 10 (1992–2021) NY 9 (1925–2024) NM 9 (1965–2023) IN 9 (1977–2015) NV 8 (1985–2017) IA 8 (1968–2017) WI 8 (1986–2024) OR 8 (1996–2024) MD 7 (1974–2018) AZ 7 (1964–2024) LA 6 (1989–2018) MA 6 (1978–2023) MN 6 (1985–2024) OK 6 (1969–2022) DC 6 (1976–2025) UT 5 (1994–2025) SD 4 (2005–2016) MI 4 (1979–2020) VT 4 (1996–2007) KS 4 (1992–2022) MO 4 (1961–2011) CO 4 (1980–2025) TN 3 (2010–2016) GA 2 (1986–2019) ND 2 (1980–1980) MT 2 (2011–2017) SC 2 (2003–2003) KY 2 (2022–2023) HI 2 (1995–2014) NC 2 (1993–2003) ID 2 (2012–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check