Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Blankholm v. Fearinggreen1 sentence2010See id. | 1 | 1 |
Dolder v. Griffingreen1 sentence1985Dolder v. Griffin, 323 N.W.2d 773, 780 (Minn.1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. v. Mensing
green
1 sentence2016Id. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Ryan Contracting Company v. O'Neill & Murphy, LLP
neutral
1 sentence2016Ryan Contracting Co. v. O’Neill & Murphy, LLP, 868 N.W.2d 473 (Minn.App.2015). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
C. Kowalski, Inc. v. Davis
green
1 sentence2015We concluded that the contractor was exempt from the pre-lien notice requirement because the record indicated that operation of a business was the “planned” use of the improvement and “[t]he fact that the use of the room changed at a later date has little relevance to the issue of whether pre-lien notice should have been given.” Id. at 877 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Polivka Logan Designers, Inc. v. Ende
green
2 sentences2009The Polivka case involved interpretation of another statutory exception to the pre-lien-notice requirement, which excused prelien notice in connection with an improvement consisting of or providing “‘more than 10,000 total usable square feet of floor space and the improvement is partly or wholly nonresidential in character.’ ” Id. at 173-74 , 251 N.W.2d at 852 (quoting Minn.Stat. § 514.011, subd. 4(ii) (Supp.1973) (Italics supplied.)). 2009The Polivka case involved interpretation of another statutory exception to the pre-lien-notice requirement, which excused prelien notice in connection with an improvement consisting of or providing “‘more than 10,000 total usable square feet of floor space and the improvement is partly or wholly nonresidential in character.’ ” Id. at 173-74 , 251 N.W.2d at 852 (quoting Minn.Stat. § 514.011, subd. 4(ii) (Supp.1973) (Italics supplied.)). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects, Inc. v. Walsh
green
1 sentence1988Korsunsky, 370 N.W.2d at 33 n. 2. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.