Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1982–1996 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williamson v. Caingreen2 sentences1982Id. at 120 ; Williamson v. Cain, 310 Minn. 59, 61 , 245 N.W.2d 242, 244 (1976); Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967). 2 The decision to release Tom Connolly, involving as it does the professional evaluation of such factors as the protection of the public, his physical and psychological needs, the relative suitability of the home environment, and the. need to reintegrate him into the community, is precisely the type of governmental decision that discretionary immunity was designed to protect from tort litigation b 1982Id. at 120 ; Williamson v. Cain, 310 Minn. 59, 61 , 245 N.W.2d 242, 244 (1976); Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967). 2 The decision to release Tom Connolly, involving as it does the professional evaluation of such factors as the protection of the public, his physical and psychological needs, the relative suitability of the home environment, and the. need to reintegrate him into the community, is precisely the type of governmental decision that discretionary immunity was designed to protect from tort litigation b | 1 | 1 |
Alex Carl Smith v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1982Id. at 120 ; Williamson v. Cain, 310 Minn. 59, 61 , 245 N.W.2d 242, 244 (1976); Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967). 2 The decision to release Tom Connolly, involving as it does the professional evaluation of such factors as the protection of the public, his physical and psychological needs, the relative suitability of the home environment, and the. need to reintegrate him into the community, is precisely the type of governmental decision that discretionary immunity was designed to protect from tort litigation b 1982Id. at 120 ; Williamson v. Cain, 310 Minn. 59, 61 , 245 N.W.2d 242, 244 (1976); Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967). [2] The decision to release Tom Connolly, involving as it does the professional evaluation of such factors as the protection of the public, his physical and psychological needs, the relative suitability of the home environment, and the need to reintegrate him into the community, is precisely the type of governmental decision that discretionary immunity was designed to protect from tort litigation | 1 | 1 |
Larson Ex Rel. Larson v. Independent School District No. 314, Brahamgreen2 sentences1982Id. at 120 ; Williamson v. Cain, 310 Minn. 59, 61 , 245 N.W.2d 242, 244 (1976); Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967). 2 The decision to release Tom Connolly, involving as it does the professional evaluation of such factors as the protection of the public, his physical and psychological needs, the relative suitability of the home environment, and the. need to reintegrate him into the community, is precisely the type of governmental decision that discretionary immunity was designed to protect from tort litigation b 1982Id. at 120 ; Williamson v. Cain, 310 Minn. 59, 61 , 245 N.W.2d 242, 244 (1976); Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967). 2 The decision to release Tom Connolly, involving as it does the professional evaluation of such factors as the protection of the public, his physical and psychological needs, the relative suitability of the home environment, and the. need to reintegrate him into the community, is precisely the type of governmental decision that discretionary immunity was designed to protect from tort litigation b | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cairl v. State
green
2 sentences1996Id. at 23 . 1996Cairl, 323 N.W.2d at 24 . | 4 | 1986–1996 |
Cook v. Trovatten
green
1 sentence1987Id. at 23 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Williams v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1982Id. at 120 ; Williamson v. Cain, 310 Minn. 59, 61 , 245 N.W.2d 242, 244 (1976); Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967). 2 The decision to release Tom Connolly, involving as it does the professional evaluation of such factors as the protection of the public, his physical and psychological needs, the relative suitability of the home environment, and the. need to reintegrate him into the community, is precisely the type of governmental decision that discretionary immunity was designed to protect from tort litigation b 1982Id. at 120 ; Williamson v. Cain, 310 Minn. 59, 61 , 245 N.W.2d 242, 244 (1976); Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967). [2] The decision to release Tom Connolly, involving as it does the professional evaluation of such factors as the protection of the public, his physical and psychological needs, the relative suitability of the home environment, and the need to reintegrate him into the community, is precisely the type of governmental decision that discretionary immunity was designed to protect from tort litigation | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Charles Town, Inc. v. Commissioner
green
2 sentences1982Id. at 120 ; Williamson v. Cain, 310 Minn. 59, 61 , 245 N.W.2d 242, 244 (1976); Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967). 2 The decision to release Tom Connolly, involving as it does the professional evaluation of such factors as the protection of the public, his physical and psychological needs, the relative suitability of the home environment, and the. need to reintegrate him into the community, is precisely the type of governmental decision that discretionary immunity was designed to protect from tort litigation b 1982Id. at 120 ; Williamson v. Cain, 310 Minn. 59, 61 , 245 N.W.2d 242, 244 (1976); Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967). [2] The decision to release Tom Connolly, involving as it does the professional evaluation of such factors as the protection of the public, his physical and psychological needs, the relative suitability of the home environment, and the need to reintegrate him into the community, is precisely the type of governmental decision that discretionary immunity was designed to protect from tort litigation | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.