6 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Russellgreen2 sentences2001Under the first prong of the Russell test, we evaluate section 609.229 to see if it provides a “genuine and substantial distinction between those inside and outside the class.” 477 N.W.2d at 889 . 2001Under the first prong of the Russell test, we evaluate section 609.229 to see if it provides a “genuine and substantial distinction between those inside and outside the class.” 477 N.W.2d at 889 . | 2 | 3 |
State v. Lopezgreen2 sentences1998This court discussed the Russell factors in State v. Lopez, 379 N.W.2d 633, 637 (Minn.App.1986), review denied (Minn. Feb. 14, 1986). 1998Lopez, 379 N.W.2d at 636-37 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Benniefield
green
2 sentences2012Benniefield, 678 N.W.2d at 46 . 2012Benniefield, 678 N.W.2d at 46 . | 2 | 2012–2012 |
Mitchell v. Steffen
green
2 sentences1993Mitchell, 487 N.W.2d at 904 . 1993Mitchell, 487 N.W.2d at 904 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.