competent and substantial evidence standard (Missouri) · Go Syfert
← Missouri issues

competent and substantial evidence standard in Missouri

6 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Phipps v. School District of Kansas Citygreen
moctapp · 1982 · cited in 2 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1995–1999
2 sentences

1999Phipps v. School Dist. of Kansas City, 645 S.W.2d 91, 94-95 (Mo.App.1982); [State ex rel.

1995Phipps v. School Dist. of Kansas City, 645 S.W.2d 91, 94-95 (Mo.App.1982); Bishop, 858 S.W.2d at 736 .

22
Public Communications Services, Inc. v. Simmonsgreen
moctapp · 2013 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016Gommc’ns Sews., Inc. v. Simmons, ' 409 S.W.3d 538, 545 (MoApp.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Fujita v. Jeffries green
moctapp · 1986
2 sentences

2010Id. at 207 .

2010Id. at 206 .

22010–2010
State Ex Rel. Marco Sales, Inc. v. Public Service Commission green
moctapp · 1984
1 sentence

2006In Marco Sales, this court noted the similarities between Article V, Section 18, and Section 386.510 and commented: Judicial inquiry into the “reasonableness or lawfulness” of decisions or orders of the Commission prescribed by Section 386.510 ... is nothing more than a reaffirmation of the constitutional mandate . as questions of “lawfulness” turn on whether the Commission’s orders or decisions are statutorily authorized and questions of “reasonableness” turn on whether there is competent and substantial evidence upon the whole record to support them. 685 S.W.2d at 218 .

12006–2006
State Ex Rel. Rice v. Bishop green
moctapp · 1993
1 sentence

1995Phipps v. School Dist. of Kansas City, 645 S.W.2d 91, 94-95 (Mo.App.1982); Bishop, 858 S.W.2d at 736 .

11995–1995

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MO § Mo. Rev. Stat. § 536.150 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

FL 8 (2005–2025) MO 6 (1995–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check