Kentucky rule in Missouri

2019KRE 611(a)(b) ; Moore v. Commonwealth, 771 S.W.2d 34 , 38 (Ky. 1988).

2019Ayers now petitions this Court to reinstate him to the Kentucky bar in accordance with our previous decisions in *857 Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Barger, 98 S.W.3d 861 , 862 (Ky. 2003) and Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Hays, 220 S.W.3d 688 (Ky. 2006).

2019Ayers now petitions this Court to reinstate him to the Kentucky bar in accordance with our previous decisions in *857 Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Barger, 98 S.W.3d 861 , 862 (Ky. 2003) and Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Hays, 220 S.W.3d 688 (Ky. 2006).

2019Similarly, KRE 611(b) states that "[a] witness may be cross-examined on any matter relevant to any issue in the case, including credibility." Kentucky's rule on cross-examination is "wide open." DeRossett v. Commonwealth, 867 S.W.2d 195 , 198 (Ky. 1993) 13 However, the scope of wide-open cross examination is subject to the reasonable discretion of the court.

2018However, "[u]nder the Kentucky standard, we conclude that the movant should not succeed unless his right to judgment is shown with such clarity that there is no room left for controversy." Id. at 482 (citing Isaacs v. Cox , 431 S.W.2d 494 (Ky. 1968) ).

2018However, "[u]nder the Kentucky standard, we conclude that the movant should not succeed unless his right to judgment is shown with such clarity that there is no room left for controversy." Id. at 482 (citing Isaacs v. Cox , 431 S.W.2d 494 (Ky. 1968) ).

2018SCR 3.130 -3.4(c) states that a lawyer shall not "knowingly disobey an obligation under the rules of a tribunal except for an open refusal based on an assertion that no valid obligation exists." Furthermore, we have held " SCR 3.435 does not require that the rules be identical to allow for the imposition of reciprocal discipline." KBA v. Meehan, 237 S.W.3d 546 , 547 (Ky. 2007).

2018SCR 3.130 -3.4(c) states that a lawyer shall not "knowingly disobey an obligation under the rules of a tribunal except for an open refusal based on an assertion that no valid obligation exists." Furthermore, we have held " SCR 3.435 does not require that the rules be identical to allow for the imposition of reciprocal discipline." KBA v. Meehan, 237 S.W.3d 546 , 547 (Ky. 2007).

2018"It is well established that Kentucky courts rely upon Federal caselaw when interpreting a Kentucky rule of procedure that is similar to its federal counterpart." Curtis Green & Clay Green, Inc. v. Clark, 318 S.W.3d 98 , 105 (Ky. App. 2010) (citing Newsome By and Through Newsome v. Lowe, 699 S.W.2d 748 (Ky. App. 1985) ); see also Kurt A. Philipps, Jr., 6 Ky. Prac.

2018"It is well established that Kentucky courts rely upon Federal caselaw when interpreting a Kentucky rule of procedure that is similar to its federal counterpart." Curtis Green & Clay Green, Inc. v. Clark, 318 S.W.3d 98 , 105 (Ky. App. 2010) (citing Newsome By and Through Newsome v. Lowe, 699 S.W.2d 748 (Ky. App. 1985) ); see also Kurt A. Philipps, Jr., 6 Ky. Prac.

2018"It is well established that Kentucky courts rely upon Federal caselaw when interpreting a Kentucky rule of procedure that is similar to its federal counterpart." Curtis Green & Clay Green, Inc. v. Clark, 318 S.W.3d 98 , 105 (Ky. App. 2010) (citing Newsome By and Through Newsome v. Lowe, 699 S.W.2d 748 (Ky. App. 1985) ); see also Kurt A. Philipps, Jr., 6 Ky. Prac.

2018"It is well established that Kentucky courts rely upon Federal caselaw when interpreting a Kentucky rule of procedure that is similar to its federal counterpart." Curtis Green & Clay Green, Inc. v. Clark, 318 S.W.3d 98 , 105 (Ky. App. 2010) (citing Newsome By and Through Newsome v. Lowe, 699 S.W.2d 748 (Ky. App. 1985) ); see also Kurt A. Philipps, Jr., 6 Ky. Prac.

2018However, "[u]nder the Kentucky standard, we conclude that the movant should not succeed unless his right to judgment is shown with such clarity that there is no room left for controversy." Id. at 482 (citing Isaacs v. Cox , 431 S.W.2d 494 (Ky. 1968) ).

2018However, "[u]nder the Kentucky standard, we conclude that the movant should not succeed unless his right to judgment is shown with such clarity that there is no room left for controversy." Id. at 482 (citing Isaacs v. Cox , 431 S.W.2d 494 (Ky. 1968) ).

1993Id.

1993Id.