legislature carries a strong presumption (Missouri) · Go Syfert
← Missouri issues

legislature carries a strong presumption in Missouri

6 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1997–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Hammerschmidt v. Boone Countygreen
mo · 1994 · cited in 3 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1997–2002
2 sentences

2002Hammerschmidt v. Boone County, 877 S.W.2d 98, 102 (Mo. banc.1994).

1997Hammerschmidt v. Boone County, 877 S.W.2d 98, 102 (Mo. banc 1994).

23
Missouri Ass'n of Club Executives, Inc. v. Stategreen
mo · 2006 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011“An act of the legislature carries a strong presumption of constitutionality.” Missouri Ass’n of Club Executives v. State, 208 S.W.3d 885, 888 (Mo. banc 2006).

11
Carmack v. Director, Missouri Department of Agriculturegreen
mo · 1997 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
1 sentence

2005“An act of the legislature carries a strong presumption of constitutionality.” Carmack v. Director, Mo. Dept. of Agriculture, 945 S.W.2d 956, 959 (Mo. banc 1997).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
St. Louis County v. Prestige Travel, Inc. green
mo · 2011
2 sentences

2019“An act of the legislature carries a strong presumption of constitutionality.” Id. (quotation marks omitted).

2019“The person challenging the validity of the statute has the burden of proving the act clearly and undoubtedly violates the constitution.” Id. (quotation marks omitted).

12019–2019
Rentschler v. Nixon green
mo · 2010
1 sentence

2011“A statute is presumed valid and will not be held unconstitutional unless it clearly contravenes a constitutional provision.” Rentschler, 311 S.W.3d at 786 .

12011–2011

Where else courts name it

MO 6 (1997–2019) AR 2 (1981–2004) IL 2 (1990–1990) NY 2 (1978–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check