sexual harassment claim in Missouri

6 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
Hill v. Ford Motor Co.green mo · 2009 · cited in 2 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2012–2016 2 sentences 2016Hill v. Ford Motor Co., 277 S.W.3d 659, 666 (Mo. banc 2009). 2012See, e.g., Hill v. Ford Motor Co., 277 S.W.3d 659, 667 (Mo. banc 2009) (reversing summary judgment on a sexual harassment claim where plaintiff presented sufficient evidence that her adverse treatment was in direct response to her refusal of her supervisor’s sexual advances).	2	2
Wright v. Over-The-Road & City Transfer Drivers, Local Union No. 41green moctapp · 1997 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 1 sentence 2005In Wright v. Over-The-Road and City Transfer Drivers, Helpers, Dockmen and Warehouse-men, the court addressed the submissibility of the sexual harassment claim before it addressed issues relating to the damages awarded on that claim because if the claim was not submissible, then the defendant would be entitled to a judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict on that claim and the damages issues would be moot. 945 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Mo.App.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

Case	Cited	Years
Sivigliano v. Harrah's North Kansas City Corp. green moctapp · 2006 1 sentence 2016Id.	1	2016–2016
Barekman v. City of Republic green moctapp · 2007 1 sentence 2011As to the employee’s sexual harassment claim, the court found that while the conduct that occurred in the workplace “may have been boorish; vulgar and inappropriate, it [did] not constitute gender discrimination under the MHRA.” Id. at 681 .	1	2011–2011
Pollock v. Wetterau Food Distribution Group green moctapp · 1999 1 sentence 2008Id. at 760-61 .	1	2008–2008

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MO § Mo. Rev. Stat. § 213.070 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 39 (1989–2026) TX 32 (1991–2026) OH 19 (1994–2023) NY 14 (1990–2014) NJ 12 (1988–2026) MA 11 (1987–2026) MI 10 (1989–2021) MN 9 (1988–2016) WV 8 (1998–2024) WA 8 (1995–2013) IL 6 (1996–2023) MO 6 (2005–2016) LA 6 (1998–2021) CT 4 (1993–2001) KY 4 (1992–2021) FL 3 (2006–2012) HI 3 (2001–2014) DC 3 (1995–2007) ME 3 (2003–2010) TN 3 (1995–2007) KS 2 (2004–2013) PA 2 (2002–2009) MD 2 (2006–2011) NM 2 (2014–2014) AZ 2 (2008–2008) CO 2 (1996–2001) IA 2 (2014–2018) WI 2 (1995–2008)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check