Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Burke v. Stategreen2 sentences2019Brown v. State, 890 So. 2d 901, 910 (Miss. 2004) (citing Burke v. State, 576 So. 2d 1239, 1242 (Miss. 1991)). 2008Burke v. State, 576 So.2d 1239, 1242 (Miss.1991). | 3 | 3 |
Brown v. Stategreen1 sentence2019Brown v. State, 890 So. 2d 901, 910 (Miss. 2004) (citing Burke v. State, 576 So. 2d 1239, 1242 (Miss. 1991)). | 1 | 1 |
Walton v. Stategreen1 sentence2018Therefore, when an accomplice jury instruction is requested, the jury must be instructed that the uncorroborated testimony should be regarded with “great caution and suspicion.” Williams, 32 So. 3d at 490-91 (¶15) (quoting Walton v. State, 998 So. 2d 971, 977 (¶17) (Miss. 2008)). | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Stategreen1 sentence2018Therefore, when an accomplice jury instruction is requested, the jury must be instructed that the uncorroborated testimony should be regarded with “great caution and suspicion.” Williams, 32 So. 3d at 490-91 (¶15) (quoting Walton v. State, 998 So. 2d 971, 977 (¶17) (Miss. 2008)). | 1 | 1 |
Wheeler v. Stategreen1 sentence2007Wheeler v. State, 560 So.2d 171, 173 (Miss. 1990) (quoting Derden v. State, 522 So.2d 752, 754 (Miss.1988)). | 1 | 1 |
Derden v. Stategreen2 sentences2007Wheeler v. State, 560 So.2d 171, 173 (Miss. 1990) (quoting Derden v. State, 522 So.2d 752, 754 (Miss.1988)). 2007Id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Goldsmith v. State
green
2 sentences2019Jones, 203 So. 3d at 611–12. 2018More recently, in Jones v. State , 203 So.3d 600 , 611-12 (¶ 35) (Miss. 2016), the Court has approved the use of the following accomplice jury instruction: During the course of his testimony in this trial, the witness John Doe claimed to have participated with the defendant in [the crime for which the defendant is on trial]. | 2 | 2018–2019 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.