6 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Davis v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Davis v. State, 660 So.2d 1228, 1255 (Miss.1995). 2000Davis v. State, 660 So. 2d 1228, 1255 (Miss. 1995). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Willner v. Committee on Character and Fitness, Appellate Div. of Supreme Court of NY, First Judicial Dept.
green
2 sentences2008Id. at 105 , 83 S.Ct. 1175 . ¶25. 2008Id. at 105 , 83 S.Ct. 1175 . ¶25. | 3 | 2006–2008 |
Penry v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2004Considering how the instructions may have been clarified, the Supreme Court stated, "Moreover, even if we thought that the arguments of defense counsel could be an adequate substitute for statements of the law by the court,... the prosecutor effectively neutralized defense counsel's argument, ... by stressing the jury's duty `[t]o follow your oath, the evidence and the law.'" Id. at 802 , 121 S.Ct. 1910 (citation omitted). 2004Considering how the instructions may have been clarified, the Supreme Court stated, "Moreover, even if we thought that the arguments of defense counsel could be an adequate substitute for statements of the law by the court,... the prosecutor effectively neutralized defense counsel's argument, ... by stressing the jury's duty `[t]o follow your oath, the evidence and the law.'" Id. at 802 , 121 S.Ct. 1910 (citation omitted). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.