Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Virginia opinions name it 3 courts 2011–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mary Ann Rowe v. Charles S. Rowegreen2 sentences2025The law of the case doctrine provides that “[w]here there have been two appeals in the same case, between the same parties, and the facts are the same, nothing decided on the first appeal can be re-examined on a second appeal.” Rowe v. Rowe, 33 Va. App. 250, 262 (2000). 2025The law of the case doctrine provides that “[w]here there have been two appeals in the same case, between the same parties, and the facts are the same, nothing decided on the first appeal can be re-examined on a second appeal.” Rowe v. Rowe, 33 Va. App. 250, 262 (2000). | 4 | 4 |
Duncan v. Brannockgreen1 sentence2012Under the current version of Virginia Code § 8.01-262(3), venue is proper in a jurisdiction in which “the defendant regularly conducts substantial business activity.” (Emphasis added.) When considering venue under Virginia Code § 8.01-262(3), the “focal time for assessing venue for purposes of conducting business is the date the action is filed.” Duncan v. Brannock, 78 Va. Cir. 169, 170 (2009) (citing Jones v. Rusteau, 43 Va. Cir. 311 (1997)). | 1 | 1 |
English v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2011See generally English v. Commonwealth, 58 Va. App. 711, 718-19 , 715 S.E.2d 391, 394-95 (2011). -3- “expressed or implied” by the circumstances of the attack. 2011See generally English v. Commonwealth, 58 Va. App. 711, 718-19 , 715 S.E.2d 391, 394-95 (2011). -3- “expressed or implied” by the circumstances of the attack. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. City of Danville
green
2 sentences2019This Court’s decision in Brown v. City of Danville, 44 Va. App. 586 (2004), is directly on point. 2019This Court’s decision in Brown v. City of Danville, 44 Va. App. 586 (2004), is directly on point. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Terry v. Ohio
green
2 sentences2012Though it does not expressly invoke the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S. Ct. 1868 , 20 L. 2012Though it does not expressly invoke the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S. Ct. 1868 , 20 L. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Jones v. Rusteau
green
1 sentence2012Under the current version of Virginia Code § 8.01-262(3), venue is proper in a jurisdiction in which “the defendant regularly conducts substantial business activity.” (Emphasis added.) When considering venue under Virginia Code § 8.01-262(3), the “focal time for assessing venue for purposes of conducting business is the date the action is filed.” Duncan v. Brannock, 78 Va. Cir. 169, 170 (2009) (citing Jones v. Rusteau, 43 Va. Cir. 311 (1997)). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.