Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. Stategreen2 sentences2011See Johnson, 987 So.2d at 424 (stating that defendant’s version “if reasonable, must be accepted as true, unless substantially contradicted in material particulars by ... the physical facts ....”) (citations omitted). ¶ 28. 2008See Johnson, 987 So. 2d at 424 (stating that defendant’s version “if reasonable, must be accepted as true, unless substantially contradicted in material particulars by . . . the physical facts . . . .”) (citations omitted). ¶28. | 2 | 2 |
Weathersby v. Stategreen2 sentences2011Weathersby v. State, 165 Miss. 207 , 147 So. 481, 482 (1933). 2011Weathersby v. State, 165 Miss. 207 , 147 So. 481, 482 (1933). | 1 | 1 |
Agee v. Stategreen1 sentence1986This rule was set forth in Agee v. State, 185 So.2d 671, 673 (1966): The State has the burden of proving the voluntariness of a confession. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Booker v. State
green
2 sentences2002In a subsequent case, Booker v. State, 699 So.2d 132 (Miss.1997), a plurality of this Court (Banks, J., with three justices concurring and one justice concurring in the result only; four justices dissenting) interpreted the former three-year statute of limitations to run from the date on which the United States Supreme Court denied Booker's motion for rehearing on his petition for writ of certiorari from his direct appeal of his sentence. 1996In a subsequent case, Booker v. State, 699 So.2d 132 (Miss. 1997), a plurality of this Court (Banks, J., with three justices concurring and one justice concurring in the result only; four justices dissenting) interpreted the former three-year statute of limitations to run from the date on which the United States Supreme Court denied Booker's motion for rehearing on his petition for writ of certiorari from his direct appeal of his sentence. | 3 | 1996–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.