Pittman rule (Mississippi) · Go Syfert
← Mississippi issues

Pittman rule in Mississippi

6 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1960–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Pittman v. Stategreen
missctapp · 2009 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013Pittman appealed, and this Court reversed, finding that Pittman’s motion was not time-barred. 1 Pittman v. State, 20 So.3d 51, 52 (¶ 1) (Miss.Ct.App.2009) (Pittman II). ¶ 4.

11
Purvis v. Barnesgreen
miss · 2001 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
1 sentence

2009“The law is well settled in Mississippi that appellate courts will not put trial courts in error for issues not first presented to the trial court for resolution, and that issues not presented in the trial court cannot be first argued on appeal.” Purvis v. Barnes, 791 So.2d 199, 202 (¶ 7) (Miss.2001) (citation omitted).

11
Ealy v. Stategreen
missctapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
1 sentence

2007Standard entrapment occurs "when an innocent person with no prior criminal inclination is induced through persistent entreaties by undercover law enforcement agents to commit an offense." Ealy v. State, 757 So.2d 1053, 1056 (¶ 7) (Miss.Ct.

11
West v. Stategreen
miss · 1988 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992Carter, Pittman, and Willis argue that the controlling case on this point is West v. State, 519 So. 2d 418, 421 (Miss. 1988), in which the Mississippi Supreme Court held that the active involvement and assistance of a trial judge with the prosecution of a defendant is reversible error.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Harris v. Stewart green
· 1940
2 sentences

1987To the contrary, Noxubee County approves the rationale of Harris v. Stewart *952 to the effect that the attorneys asked to give the statutory affidavit/certificate are deemed "quasi-judicial officers" who may be disqualified only on grounds that "would disqualify a judge." Noxubee County, 443 So.2d at 1194 , quoting Harris v. Stewart, 187 Miss. at 506 , 193 So. at 343 .

1987To the contrary, Noxubee County approves the rationale of Harris v. Stewart *952 to the effect that the attorneys asked to give the statutory affidavit/certificate are deemed "quasi-judicial officers" who may be disqualified only on grounds that "would disqualify a judge." Noxubee County, 443 So.2d at 1194 , quoting Harris v. Stewart, 187 Miss. at 506 , 193 So. at 343 .

11987–1987
Noxubee County Democratic E. Com. v. Russell green
miss · 1983
2 sentences

1987To the contrary, Noxubee County approves the rationale of Harris v. Stewart *952 to the effect that the attorneys asked to give the statutory affidavit/certificate are deemed "quasi-judicial officers" who may be disqualified only on grounds that "would disqualify a judge." Noxubee County, 443 So.2d at 1194 , quoting Harris v. Stewart, 187 Miss. at 506 , 193 So. at 343 .

1987To the contrary, Noxubee County approves the rationale of Harris v. Stewart *952 to the effect that the attorneys asked to give the statutory affidavit/certificate are deemed "quasi-judicial officers" who may be disqualified only on grounds that "would disqualify a judge." Noxubee County, 443 So.2d at 1194 , quoting Harris v. Stewart, 187 Miss. at 506 , 193 So. at 343 .

11987–1987
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Hood green
· 1920
2 sentences

1960United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Hood, 124 Miss. 548 , 87 So. 115, 119 , 15 A. L.

1960United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Hood, 124 Miss. 548 , 87 So. 115, 119 , 15 A. L.

11960–1960

Where else courts name it

PA 21 (2017–2023) MS 6 (1960–2013) OH 4 (2005–2022) IN 3 (1988–2024) FL 3 (1990–1998) CA 3 (1996–2018) LA 3 (1966–2015) CO 2 (2024–2024) GA 2 (2017–2017) SC 2 (1999–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check