recusal hearing (Mississippi) · Go Syfert
← Mississippi issues

recusal hearing in Mississippi

6 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Burney v. Stategreen
miss · 1987 · cited in 2 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2002–2005
2 sentences

2005This Court has stated that, "[t]o the appellant falls the duty of insuring that the record contains sufficient evidence to support his assignments of error on appeal." Burney v. State, 515 So.2d 1154, 1160 (Miss.1987).

2002This Court has stated that,"[t]o the appellant falls the duty of insuring that the record contains sufficient evidence to support his assignments of error on appeal." Burney v. State, 515 So. 2d 1154, 1160 (Miss. 1987).

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Burnham v. Stevens green
missctapp · 1999
2 sentences

2004Id.

2001Id.

22001–2004
In Re Moffett green
miss · 1990
1 sentence

2021Even without proof of actual bias, the recusal standard must consider appearances, in other words, “how this situation appears to the general public and the litigants . . . .” In re Moffett, 556 So. 2d 723 , 22 The majority misstated the standard of evidence required under Canon 3A.

12021–2021
Davis v. Neshoba County General Hosp. green
miss · 1992
1 sentence

1995Davis, 611 So.2d at 905 .

11995–1995

Where else courts name it

TX 75 (1993–2026) PA 29 (1984–2026) LA 7 (1994–2019) GA 6 (1981–2020) MS 6 (1995–2021) CA 4 (1984–2023) AL 4 (1989–2024) IA 4 (2020–2025) KY 2 (2017–2020) WV 2 (1995–2014) WI 2 (2015–2026) NE 2 (1999–2004) CT 2 (2017–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check