issuance warning (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

issuance warning in North Carolina

6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2009 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. McClendongreen
nc · 1999 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2002–2009
2 sentences

2009Id. at 639 , 517 S.E.2d at 134 .

2009Id. at 639 , 517 S.E.2d at 134 .

12
State v. McClendongreen
ncctapp · 1998 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1999–2000
2 sentences

2000In McClendon, 130 N.C.

1999The Court of Appeals further concluded that, “based on the totality of the circumstances here, the detention of the defendant beyond the issuance of the warning ticket was justified and that no violation of defendant’s constitutional rights occurred.” State v. McClendon, 130 N.C.

12
State v. Watkinsgreen
nc · 1994 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998
2 sentences

1998Our Supreme Court in State v. Watkins, 337 N.C. 437, 441-42 , 446 S.E.2d 67, 69-70 (1994), set out the law concerning investigatory stops as follows: The Fourth Amendment protects the "right of the people ... against unreasonable searches and seizures." U.S. Const. amend.

1998Our Supreme Court in State v. Watkins, 337 N.C. 437, 441-42 , 446 S.E.2d 67, 69-70 (1994), set out the law concerning investigatory stops as follows: The Fourth Amendment protects the "right of the people ... against unreasonable searches and seizures." U.S. Const. amend.

11
State v. Hendricksongreen
nc · 1997 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998
2 sentences

1998See State v. Hendrickson, 124 N.C.App. 150 , 476 S.E.2d 389 (1996), appeal dismissed and disc. review improvidently allowed, 346 N.C. 273 , 485 S.E.2d 45 (1997).

1998See State v. Hendrickson, 124 N.C.App. 150 , 476 S.E.2d 389 (1996), appeal dismissed and disc. review improvidently allowed, 346 N.C. 273 , 485 S.E.2d 45 (1997).

11
State v. Hendricksongreen
ncctapp · 1996 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998
2 sentences

1998See State v. Hendrickson, 124 N.C.App. 150 , 476 S.E.2d 389 (1996), appeal dismissed and disc. review improvidently allowed, 346 N.C. 273 , 485 S.E.2d 45 (1997).

1998See State v. Hendrickson, 124 N.C.App. 150 , 476 S.E.2d 389 (1996), appeal dismissed and disc. review improvidently allowed, 346 N.C. 273 , 485 S.E.2d 45 (1997).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Falana green
ncctapp · 1998
2 sentences

2000This Court did not specifically discuss the canine sniff, but noted that the trooper’s reasons for extending the traffic stop beyond the issuance of a warning ticket “were insufficient to support a further detention of the defendant once the warning ticket was issued and the defendant’s papers were returned.” Id. at 817 , 501 S.E.2d at 360 .

2000This Court did not specifically discuss the canine sniff, but noted that the trooper’s reasons for extending the traffic stop beyond the issuance of a warning ticket “were insufficient to support a further detention of the defendant once the warning ticket was issued and the defendant’s papers were returned.” Id. at 817 , 501 S.E.2d at 360 .

12000–2000
State v. Morocco green
ncctapp · 1990
1 sentence

1998Generally, “the scope of the detention must be carefully tailored to its underlying justification.” State v. Morocco, 99 N.C.

11998–1998

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-302 (3) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-152 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

PA 33 (1947–2025) TX 16 (1999–2025) IL 15 (1952–2025) NY 14 (1976–2025) GA 12 (1931–2014) FL 10 (1944–2013) SC 9 (1930–2013) AL 9 (1924–2001) WV 8 (1900–2019) MA 7 (2005–2023) NJ 7 (1991–2020) LA 6 (1933–2004) OH 6 (1990–2019) NC 6 (1998–2009) KS 5 (1997–2011) CA 5 (2003–2014) CT 4 (1994–2012) TN 4 (2009–2025) AR 4 (1906–2010) WI 4 (1985–2013) IA 3 (1914–2015) MO 3 (2004–2011) IN 3 (1997–2001) MT 3 (1951–2004) HI 3 (1978–2026) DC 3 (1983–2011) VT 3 (1983–2010) NM 3 (2011–2018) CO 2 (1999–2016) SD 2 (1988–2013) KY 2 (1924–1950) VA 2 (1932–1962) OR 2 (1909–1932) UT 2 (2013–2013) MS 2 (1955–1958) ID 2 (2002–2009) AZ 2 (1977–2003)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check