Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hammond v. Sainigreen2 sentences2021Hammond v. Saini, 229 N.C. 2021Hammond v. Saini, 229 N.C. | 3 | 5 |
Sharpe v. Worlandgreen2 sentences2014App. ___, ___, 748 S.E.2d 585, 588 (2013). “[I]mmediate appeal is available from an interlocutory order or judgment which affects a substantial right.” Sharpe v. Worland, 351 N.C. 159, 162 , 522 S.E.2d 577, 579 (1999) (quotation marks omitted). 2014App. ___, ___, 748 S.E.2d 585, 588 (2013). “[I]mmediate appeal is available from an interlocutory order or judgment which affects a substantial right.” Sharpe v. Worland, 351 N.C. 159, 162 , 522 S.E.2d 577, 579 (1999) (quotation marks omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Woods v. Moses Cone Health Systemgreen1 sentence2013See, e.g., Woods v. Moses Cone Health Sys., 198 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bryson v. HAYWOOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
green
2 sentences2013Thus, because of the defendants’ failure to provide sufficient evidence that the medical review privilege applied, id. at 538-39 , 694 S.E.2d at 421 , we were compelled to conclude that the hospital had “failed to meet its burden of showing that the documents f [e]ll into one of the three categories of privileged material under N.C. 2013Thus, because of the defendants’ failure to provide sufficient evidence that the medical review privilege applied, id. at 538-39 , 694 S.E.2d at 421 , we were compelled to conclude that the hospital had “failed to meet its burden of showing that the documents f [e]ll into one of the three categories of privileged material under N.C. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.