Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Vincoli v. Stategreen2 sentences2018App. at ----, 792 S.E.2d at 814 (footnote and quotation marks omitted). 2018App. at ----, 792 S.E.2d at 814 (footnote and quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Enoch v. Alamance County Dep't of Social Servicesgreen2 sentences2016Id. at 244 , 595 S.E.2d at 753 . 2016Id. at 244 , 595 S.E.2d at 753 . | 1 | 1 |
Nailing v. UNC-CHgreen2 sentences1997Nailing v. UNC-CH, 117 N.C.App. 318, 324 , 451 S.E.2d 351, 355 (1994), disc. review denied, 339 N.C. 614 , 454 S.E.2d 255 (1995). 1997Nailing v. UNC-CH, 117 N.C.App. 318, 324 , 451 S.E.2d 351, 355 (1994), disc. review denied, 339 N.C. 614 , 454 S.E.2d 255 (1995). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Presnell v. Pell
green
2 sentences2022Presnell v. Pell, 298 N.C. 715 , 724–25 (1979). 8 This legitimate governmental objective need not be the actual objective of the state actors. 2022Presnell v. Pell, 298 N.C. 715 , 724–25 (1979). 8 This legitimate governmental objective need not be the actual objective of the state actors. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Wetherington v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety
green
2 sentences2017Critically, the trooper's commanding officer testified "at the OAH hearing ... that he decided to dismiss petitioner not based upon consideration of the facts and circumstances of petitioner's conduct, but instead because of his erroneous view that any violation of the [Highway] Patrol's truthfulness policy must result in dismissal." Id. at 592 , 780 S.E.2d at 547 -48 . 2017Critically, the trooper's commanding officer testified "at the OAH hearing ... that he decided to dismiss petitioner not based upon consideration of the facts and circumstances of petitioner's conduct, but instead because of his erroneous view that any violation of the [Highway] Patrol's truthfulness policy must result in dismissal." Id. at 592 , 780 S.E.2d at 547 -48 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Curtis v. North Carolina Department of Transportation
green
2 sentences2016Because the record includes substantial evidence of Ledford's affiliation with the Democratic party, see Curtis, 140 N.C.App. at 479 , 537 S.E.2d at 502 , we conclude that Ledford did satisfy this element. 8 The challenged testimony also is highly probative of another element necessary to Ledford's claim, discussed infra, that the purportedly nondiscriminatory reason articulated by DPS for his termination was pretextual. 9 The relevant subsection here is labeled "Posting Requirements Not Applicable" and provides that: "Posting is not required when an agency determines that it will not openly r 2016Because the record includes substantial evidence of Ledford's affiliation with the Democratic party, see Curtis, 140 N.C.App. at 479 , 537 S.E.2d at 502 , we conclude that Ledford did satisfy this element. 8 The challenged testimony also is highly probative of another element necessary to Ledford's claim, discussed infra, that the purportedly nondiscriminatory reason articulated by DPS for his termination was pretextual. 9 The relevant subsection here is labeled "Posting Requirements Not Applicable" and provides that: "Posting is not required when an agency determines that it will not openly r | 1 | 2016–2016 |
City of Rockingham v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources
green
2 sentences2016City of Rockingham, 224 N.C.App. at 239 , 736 S.E.2d at 771 . 2016City of Rockingham, 224 N.C.App. at 239 , 736 S.E.2d at 771 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Newberne v. DEPT. OF CRIME CONTROL
green
1 sentence2016Given the two grounds clearly indicated for his requested OAH hearing and the conspicuous absence of any allegation in his petition that his dismissal was the result of retaliation in violation of the Whistleblower Act, the Court held that "the doctrine of administrative exhaustion does not prevent [the] plaintiff from filing a whistleblower claim in superior court." Id. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Hodge
green
2 sentences2016The evidence presented during the OAH hearing demonstrated that DOT's IAS Chief had: (1) "considerable independence to direct and supervise audits inside the DOT"; (2) "supervisory authority within the section over other auditors' work and assignments"; and (3) responsibility for "consult[ing] with the heads of units being audited and with higher-ranking DOT officials and ma[king] recommendations for changes based on the result of audits." *457 Id. at 604 , 499 S.E.2d at 189 . 2016The evidence presented during the OAH hearing demonstrated that DOT's IAS Chief had: (1) "considerable independence to direct and supervise audits inside the DOT"; (2) "supervisory authority within the section over other auditors' work and assignments"; and (3) responsibility for "consult[ing] with the heads of units being audited and with higher-ranking DOT officials and ma[king] recommendations for changes based on the result of audits." *457 Id. at 604 , 499 S.E.2d at 189 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Patterson v. AT & T Technologies
green
2 sentences1997Nailing v. UNC-CH, 117 N.C.App. 318, 324 , 451 S.E.2d 351, 355 (1994), disc. review denied, 339 N.C. 614 , 454 S.E.2d 255 (1995). 1997Nailing v. UNC-CH, 117 N.C.App. 318, 324 , 451 S.E.2d 351, 355 (1994), disc. review denied, 339 N.C. 614 , 454 S.E.2d 255 (1995). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Nailing v. UNC-CH
green
2 sentences1997Nailing v. UNC-CH, 117 N.C.App. 318, 324 , 451 S.E.2d 351, 355 (1994), disc. review denied, 339 N.C. 614 , 454 S.E.2d 255 (1995). 1997Nailing v. UNC-CH, 117 N.C.App. 318, 324 , 451 S.E.2d 351, 355 (1994), disc. review denied, 339 N.C. 614 , 454 S.E.2d 255 (1995). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.