Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 1889–1935 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pusey v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
green
1 sentence1935R., 181 N. C., 137 (141-2), is the following: “The courts recognize the doctrine included in the second prayer for instruction, but as it is said in Withey v. Fowler Co., 164 Iowa, 377 : ‘It is somewhat difficult to state a comprehensive definition of what constitutes a joint enterprise as applied to this class of cases, but it is perhaps sufficiently accurate for present purposes to say that to impute a driver’s negligence to another occupant of his carriage, the relation between them must be shown to be something more than that of host or guest, and the mere fact that both have engaged in th | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Withey v. Fowler Co.
green
1 sentence1935R., 181 N. C., 137 (141-2), is the following: “The courts recognize the doctrine included in the second prayer for instruction, but as it is said in Withey v. Fowler Co., 164 Iowa, 377 : ‘It is somewhat difficult to state a comprehensive definition of what constitutes a joint enterprise as applied to this class of cases, but it is perhaps sufficiently accurate for present purposes to say that to impute a driver’s negligence to another occupant of his carriage, the relation between them must be shown to be something more than that of host or guest, and the mere fact that both have engaged in th | 1 | 1935–1935 |
State v. Blevins.
green
1 sentence1915A homicide is not excused by fear that the deceased is about to commit a mere assault. *706 The second prayer for instruction was properly refused, for it is well settled that the reasonableness of the apprehension is one of fact for the jury. ’ S. v. Blevins, 138 N. C., 668 ; S. v. Clark, 134 N. C., 704. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Bryan v. . Spivey
neutral
2 sentences1896To sustain this ruling would be to overrule Bryan v. Spivey, 109 N. C., 57 , which expressly holds that the law presumes possession unexplained to be adverse .possession. 1896"But that plaintiffs must go further and show affirmatively that this possession was adverse, as the law does not infer from the mere fact of the possession that it was adverse." To sustain this ruling would be to overrule Bryan v. Spivey , 109 N.C. 57 , which expressly holds that the law presumes possession unexplained to be adverse possession. | 1 | 1896–1896 |
Emry v. . R. R.
green
1 sentence1895Emry v. Railroad, 109 N. C., 589 . | 1 | 1895–1895 |
State v. Hill
neutral
1 sentence1892State v. Scott, 26 N. C., 410 ; State v. Hill, 20 N. C., 491 . | 1 | 1892–1892 |
Wilson v. Norfolk & Southern Railroad
neutral
1 sentence1889R. , 90 N.C. 69 . | 1 | 1889–1889 |