Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Walton v. Arizona
red
2 sentences2003After the defendant’s appeal was perfected, but before it was decided, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Ring that its prior decisions in Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S. Ct. 3047 , 111 L. 2003After the defendant’s appeal was perfected, but before it was decided, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Ring that its prior decisions in Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S. Ct. 3047 , 111 L. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Gales
green
2 sentences2003We first addressed the effect of Ring on Nebraska’s capital sentencing scheme in State v. Gales, 265 Neb. 598 , 658 N.W.2d 604 (2003), a direct appeal in a capital case, in which the defendant assigned as error the trial court’s denial of his motion challenging the constitutionality of Nebraska’s capital sentencing statutes and requesting a jury determination of sentencing issues. 2003We first addressed the effect of Ring on Nebraska’s capital sentencing scheme in State v. Gales, 265 Neb. 598 , 658 N.W.2d 604 (2003), a direct appeal in a capital case, in which the defendant assigned as error the trial court’s denial of his motion challenging the constitutionality of Nebraska’s capital sentencing statutes and requesting a jury determination of sentencing issues. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Tolbert
green
2 sentences2001The Supreme Court quoted the language of § 29-2261 and said that it construed this statute “as a mandate upon the sentencing court to obtain and consider a presentence investigation with every felony conviction.” 223 Neb. at 795 , 394 N.W.2d at 289 . 2001The Supreme Court quoted the language of § 29-2261 and said that it construed this statute “as a mandate upon the sentencing court to obtain and consider a presentence investigation with every felony conviction.” 223 Neb. at 795 , 394 N.W.2d at 289 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Barks v. Cosgriff Co.
green
2 sentences2000The instant case is similar to Barks v. Cosgriff Co., 247 Neb. 660 , 529 N.W.2d 749 (1995), in which the defendant assigned as error on appeal the admission of testimony regarding an alleged oral contract of employment. 2000The instant case is similar to Barks v. Cosgriff Co., 247 Neb. 660 , 529 N.W.2d 749 (1995), in which the defendant assigned as error on appeal the admission of testimony regarding an alleged oral contract of employment. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Rowe
green
2 sentences1996In State v. Rowe, 214 Neb. 685 , 335 N.W.2d 309 (1983), the defendant assigned as error insufficient evidence to support a second degree murder conviction. 1996In State v. Rowe, 214 Neb. 685 , 335 N.W.2d 309 (1983), the defendant assigned as error insufficient evidence to support a second degree murder conviction. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Alvarado
green
2 sentences1993In State v. Alvarado, 226 Neb. 195 , 410 N.W.2d 118 (1987), *373 the defendant assigned as error the trial court’s failure to find that he had made a prima facie showing under Batson . 1993In State v. Alvarado, 226 Neb. 195 , 410 N.W.2d 118 (1987), *373 the defendant assigned as error the trial court’s failure to find that he had made a prima facie showing under Batson . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State ex rel. Nelson v. Smith
neutral
2 sentences1985Nelson, v. Smith, 114 Neb. 653 , 209 N.W. 328 (1926): “ ‘The legislature is clothed with the power of defining crimes and misdemeanors and fixing their punishment; and its discretion in this respect, exercised within constitutional limits, is not subject to review by the courts.’ ” Further, in State v. Tatreau, 176 Neb. 381 , 126 N.W.2d 157 (1964), the defendant assigned as error the imposition of a life sentence. 1985Nelson, v. Smith, 114 Neb. 653 , 209 N.W. 328 (1926): “ ‘The legislature is clothed with the power of defining crimes and misdemeanors and fixing their punishment; and its discretion in this respect, exercised within constitutional limits, is not subject to review by the courts.’ ” Further, in State v. Tatreau, 176 Neb. 381 , 126 N.W.2d 157 (1964), the defendant assigned as error the imposition of a life sentence. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Tatreau
green
2 sentences1985Nelson, v. Smith, 114 Neb. 653 , 209 N.W. 328 (1926): “ ‘The legislature is clothed with the power of defining crimes and misdemeanors and fixing their punishment; and its discretion in this respect, exercised within constitutional limits, is not subject to review by the courts.’ ” Further, in State v. Tatreau, 176 Neb. 381 , 126 N.W.2d 157 (1964), the defendant assigned as error the imposition of a life sentence. 1985Nelson, v. Smith, 114 Neb. 653 , 209 N.W. 328 (1926): “ ‘The legislature is clothed with the power of defining crimes and misdemeanors and fixing their punishment; and its discretion in this respect, exercised within constitutional limits, is not subject to review by the courts.’ ” Further, in State v. Tatreau, 176 Neb. 381 , 126 N.W.2d 157 (1964), the defendant assigned as error the imposition of a life sentence. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.