Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1935–1998 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Grand Island School District 2 v. Celotex Corp.green2 sentences1991The only restriction on the exercise of this power is, that the legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete, and that no limitation shall be made to take effect on existing claims without allowing a reasonable time for parties to bring action before these claims are absolutely barred by a new enactment.' ..." Grand Island School Dist. # 2 v. Celotex Corp., 203 Neb. 559, 563-64 , 279 N.W.2d 603, 607 (1979), quoting Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, O., S., H. & S., Inc., 192 Neb. 431 , 222 N.W.2d 125 (1974), quoting Horbach v. Miller, 4 Neb. 31 (1875) 1991The only restriction on the exercise of this power is, that the legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete, and that no limitation shall be made to take effect on existing claims without allowing a reasonable time for parties to bring action before these claims are absolutely barred by a new enactment.' ..." Grand Island School Dist. # 2 v. Celotex Corp., 203 Neb. 559, 563-64 , 279 N.W.2d 603, 607 (1979), quoting Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, O., S., H. & S., Inc., 192 Neb. 431 , 222 N.W.2d 125 (1974), quoting Horbach v. Miller, 4 Neb. 31 (1875) | 1 | 2 |
Dorland v. City of Humboldtgreen2 sentences1998See Dorland v. City of Humboldt, 129 Neb. 477 , 484 , 262 N.W. 22 , 25 (1935) (stating that "the Legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete" in rejecting the contention "that the Legislature [could] set aside the bar of the statute of limitations and permit the recovery of illegal taxes," thus "open[ing] the door" to "permit the recovery of other taxes paid years before."). 1998See Dorland v. City of Humboldt, 129 Neb. 477 , 484 , 262 N.W. 22 , 25 (1935) (stating that "the Legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete" in rejecting the contention "that the Legislature [could] set aside the bar of the statute of limitations and permit the recovery of illegal taxes," thus "open[ing] the door" to "permit the recovery of other taxes paid years before."). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Horbach v. Miller
green
2 sentences1991The only restriction on the exercise of this power is, that the legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete, and that no limitation shall be made to take effect on existing claims without allowing a reasonable time for parties to bring action before these claims are absolutely barred by a new enactment.' ..." Grand Island School Dist. # 2 v. Celotex Corp., 203 Neb. 559, 563-64 , 279 N.W.2d 603, 607 (1979), quoting Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, O., S., H. & S., Inc., 192 Neb. 431 , 222 N.W.2d 125 (1974), quoting Horbach v. Miller, 4 Neb. 31 (1875) 1991The only restriction on the exercise of this power is, that the legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete, and that no limitation shall be made to take effect on existing claims without allowing a reasonable time for parties to bring action before these claims are absolutely barred by a new enactment.’...” Grand Island School Dist. #2 v. Celotex Corp., 203 Neb. 559, 563-64 , 279 N.W.2d 603, 607 (1979), quoting Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, O., S., H. & S., Inc., 192 Neb. 431 , 222 N.W.2d 125 (1974), quoting Horbach v. Miller, 4 Neb. 31 (1875), | 3 | 1935–1991 |
Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, Olsen, Schropp, Horn & Swartzbaugh, Inc.
green
2 sentences1991The only restriction on the exercise of this power is, that the legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete, and that no limitation shall be made to take effect on existing claims without allowing a reasonable time for parties to bring action before these claims are absolutely barred by a new enactment.' ..." Grand Island School Dist. # 2 v. Celotex Corp., 203 Neb. 559, 563-64 , 279 N.W.2d 603, 607 (1979), quoting Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, O., S., H. & S., Inc., 192 Neb. 431 , 222 N.W.2d 125 (1974), quoting Horbach v. Miller, 4 Neb. 31 (1875) 1991The only restriction on the exercise of this power is, that the legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete, and that no limitation shall be made to take effect on existing claims without allowing a reasonable time for parties to bring action before these claims are absolutely barred by a new enactment.' ..." Grand Island School Dist. # 2 v. Celotex Corp., 203 Neb. 559, 563-64 , 279 N.W.2d 603, 607 (1979), quoting Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, O., S., H. & S., Inc., 192 Neb. 431 , 222 N.W.2d 125 (1974), quoting Horbach v. Miller, 4 Neb. 31 (1875) | 3 | 1976–1991 |
Battles v. Fobes
neutral
2 sentences1991The only restriction on the exercise of this power is, that the legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete, and that no limitation shall be made to take effect on existing claims without allowing a reasonable time for parties to bring action before these claims are absolutely barred by a new enactment.' ..." Grand Island School Dist. # 2 v. Celotex Corp., 203 Neb. 559, 563-64 , 279 N.W.2d 603, 607 (1979), quoting Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, O., S., H. & S., Inc., 192 Neb. 431 , 222 N.W.2d 125 (1974), quoting Horbach v. Miller, 4 Neb. 31 (1875) 1991The only restriction on the exercise of this power is, that the legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete, and that no limitation shall be made to take effect on existing claims without allowing a reasonable time for parties to bring action before these claims are absolutely barred by a new enactment.’...” Grand Island School Dist. #2 v. Celotex Corp., 203 Neb. 559, 563-64 , 279 N.W.2d 603, 607 (1979), quoting Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, O., S., H. & S., Inc., 192 Neb. 431 , 222 N.W.2d 125 (1974), quoting Horbach v. Miller, 4 Neb. 31 (1875), | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Wright v. Oakley
green
2 sentences1991The only restriction on the exercise of this power is, that the legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete, and that no limitation shall be made to take effect on existing claims without allowing a reasonable time for parties to bring action before these claims are absolutely barred by a new enactment.' ..." Grand Island School Dist. # 2 v. Celotex Corp., 203 Neb. 559, 563-64 , 279 N.W.2d 603, 607 (1979), quoting Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, O., S., H. & S., Inc., 192 Neb. 431 , 222 N.W.2d 125 (1974), quoting Horbach v. Miller, 4 Neb. 31 (1875) 1991The only restriction on the exercise of this power is, that the legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete, and that no limitation shall be made to take effect on existing claims without allowing a reasonable time for parties to bring action before these claims are absolutely barred by a new enactment.’...” Grand Island School Dist. #2 v. Celotex Corp., 203 Neb. 559, 563-64 , 279 N.W.2d 603, 607 (1979), quoting Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, O., S., H. & S., Inc., 192 Neb. 431 , 222 N.W.2d 125 (1974), quoting Horbach v. Miller, 4 Neb. 31 (1875), | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Willard v. Clarke
neutral
2 sentences1991The only restriction on the exercise of this power is, that the legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete, and that no limitation shall be made to take effect on existing claims without allowing a reasonable time for parties to bring action before these claims are absolutely barred by a new enactment.' ..." Grand Island School Dist. # 2 v. Celotex Corp., 203 Neb. 559, 563-64 , 279 N.W.2d 603, 607 (1979), quoting Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, O., S., H. & S., Inc., 192 Neb. 431 , 222 N.W.2d 125 (1974), quoting Horbach v. Miller, 4 Neb. 31 (1875) 1991The only restriction on the exercise of this power is, that the legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete, and that no limitation shall be made to take effect on existing claims without allowing a reasonable time for parties to bring action before these claims are absolutely barred by a new enactment.’...” Grand Island School Dist. #2 v. Celotex Corp., 203 Neb. 559, 563-64 , 279 N.W.2d 603, 607 (1979), quoting Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, O., S., H. & S., Inc., 192 Neb. 431 , 222 N.W.2d 125 (1974), quoting Horbach v. Miller, 4 Neb. 31 (1875), | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Brigham v. Bigelow
green
2 sentences1991The only restriction on the exercise of this power is, that the legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete, and that no limitation shall be made to take effect on existing claims without allowing a reasonable time for parties to bring action before these claims are absolutely barred by a new enactment.' ..." Grand Island School Dist. # 2 v. Celotex Corp., 203 Neb. 559, 563-64 , 279 N.W.2d 603, 607 (1979), quoting Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, O., S., H. & S., Inc., 192 Neb. 431 , 222 N.W.2d 125 (1974), quoting Horbach v. Miller, 4 Neb. 31 (1875) 1991The only restriction on the exercise of this power is, that the legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete, and that no limitation shall be made to take effect on existing claims without allowing a reasonable time for parties to bring action before these claims are absolutely barred by a new enactment.’...” Grand Island School Dist. #2 v. Celotex Corp., 203 Neb. 559, 563-64 , 279 N.W.2d 603, 607 (1979), quoting Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, O., S., H. & S., Inc., 192 Neb. 431 , 222 N.W.2d 125 (1974), quoting Horbach v. Miller, 4 Neb. 31 (1875), | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Darling v. Wells
green
2 sentences1991The only restriction on the exercise of this power is, that the legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete, and that no limitation shall be made to take effect on existing claims without allowing a reasonable time for parties to bring action before these claims are absolutely barred by a new enactment.' ..." Grand Island School Dist. # 2 v. Celotex Corp., 203 Neb. 559, 563-64 , 279 N.W.2d 603, 607 (1979), quoting Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, O., S., H. & S., Inc., 192 Neb. 431 , 222 N.W.2d 125 (1974), quoting Horbach v. Miller, 4 Neb. 31 (1875) 1991The only restriction on the exercise of this power is, that the legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete, and that no limitation shall be made to take effect on existing claims without allowing a reasonable time for parties to bring action before these claims are absolutely barred by a new enactment.’...” Grand Island School Dist. #2 v. Celotex Corp., 203 Neb. 559, 563-64 , 279 N.W.2d 603, 607 (1979), quoting Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, O., S., H. & S., Inc., 192 Neb. 431 , 222 N.W.2d 125 (1974), quoting Horbach v. Miller, 4 Neb. 31 (1875), | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Bigelow v. Bemis
green
2 sentences1991The only restriction on the exercise of this power is, that the legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete, and that no limitation shall be made to take effect on existing claims without allowing a reasonable time for parties to bring action before these claims are absolutely barred by a new enactment.' ..." Grand Island School Dist. # 2 v. Celotex Corp., 203 Neb. 559, 563-64 , 279 N.W.2d 603, 607 (1979), quoting Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, O., S., H. & S., Inc., 192 Neb. 431 , 222 N.W.2d 125 (1974), quoting Horbach v. Miller, 4 Neb. 31 (1875) 1991The only restriction on the exercise of this power is, that the legislature cannot remove a bar or limitation which has already become complete, and that no limitation shall be made to take effect on existing claims without allowing a reasonable time for parties to bring action before these claims are absolutely barred by a new enactment.’...” Grand Island School Dist. #2 v. Celotex Corp., 203 Neb. 559, 563-64 , 279 N.W.2d 603, 607 (1979), quoting Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, O., S., H. & S., Inc., 192 Neb. 431 , 222 N.W.2d 125 (1974), quoting Horbach v. Miller, 4 Neb. 31 (1875), | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.