meritless claim (Nebraska) · Go Syfert
← Nebraska issues

meritless claim in Nebraska

6 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2026 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Jaegergreen
neb · 2022 · cited in 2 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025See State v. Jaeger, 311 Neb. 69 , 970 N.W.2d 751 (2022).

2025See State v. Jaeger, 311 Neb. 69 , 970 N.W.2d 751 (2022).

22
State v. Swartzgreen
neb · 2025 · cited in 2 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
2 sentences

2026See State v. Swartz, 318 Neb. 553, 572 , 17 N.W.3d 174 , 188 (2025).

2026State v. Swartz, 318 Neb. 553 , 17 N.W.3d 174 (2025).

12
Dewey Baker v. Director, United States Parole Commissiongreen
cadc · 1990 · cited in 1 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
1 sentence

2006See, Baker v. Director, U.S. Parole Com’n, 916 F.2d 725 (D.C.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Samayoa green
neb · 2015
1 sentence

2016Dubray’s appellate counsel was not ineffec- tive for failing to raise a meritless challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. (d) Competency [27] Dubray also asserts that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the issues of whether the trial court erred in not conducting a competency hearing and 39 See State v. Samayoa, 292 Neb. 334 , 873 N.W.2d 449 (2015). 40 State v. Dubray, supra note 1, 289 Neb. at 228-29, 854 N.W.2d at 605. - 955 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 294 Nebraska R eports STATE v. DUBRAY Cite as 294 Neb. 937 whether trial counsel was ineffective f

12016–2016
State v. Dubray green
neb · 2016
1 sentence

2016Dubray’s appellate counsel was not ineffec- tive for failing to raise a meritless challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. (d) Competency [27] Dubray also asserts that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the issues of whether the trial court erred in not conducting a competency hearing and 39 See State v. Samayoa, 292 Neb. 334 , 873 N.W.2d 449 (2015). 40 State v. Dubray, supra note 1, 289 Neb. at 228-29, 854 N.W.2d at 605. - 955 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 294 Nebraska R eports STATE v. DUBRAY Cite as 294 Neb. 937 whether trial counsel was ineffective f

12016–2016

Where else courts name it

PA 1151 (1979–2026) FL 67 (2000–2024) IA 49 (2004–2025) IL 43 (1991–2025) CA 31 (1985–2025) NJ 22 (2017–2026) MI 18 (2012–2025) NY 15 (1983–2025) MO 14 (1992–2025) OH 13 (1992–2025) GA 12 (1990–2026) TX 11 (1987–2020) IN 11 (1991–2020) AL 11 (1986–2026) NC 7 (2008–2024) UT 6 (1989–2012) NE 6 (2006–2026) WI 6 (2018–2026) MA 5 (2005–2026) MN 5 (1968–2010) VA 5 (2021–2026) NV 4 (2018–2020) AZ 4 (1988–2015) OK 3 (2020–2021) HI 3 (2023–2024) DC 3 (2014–2018) WA 3 (2009–2018) KS 3 (2021–2022) SC 2 (2023–2024) CO 2 (1992–2013) CT 2 (2001–2006) ME 2 (1979–2012) NM 2 (1997–2018) TN 2 (1991–2010)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check