party bringing the estoppel claim (New Hampshire) · Go Syfert
← New Hampshire issues

party bringing the estoppel claim in New Hampshire

6 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
City of Concord v. Tompkinsgreen
nh · 1984 · cited in 2 New Hampshire opinions naming this issue, 2002–2014
2 sentences

2014In addition, “[t]he reliance by the party bringing the estoppel claim on the representation or concealment must have been reasonable.” Id. at 468 .

2002See City of Concord v. Tompkins, 124 N.H. 463, 467 (1984).

12
Cadle Co. v. Bourgeoisgreen
nh · 2003 · cited in 1 New Hampshire opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
1 sentence

2007The Cadle Co. v. Bourgeois, 149 N.H. 410, 418 (2003).

11
Healey v. New Durham Zoning Board of Adjustmentgreen
nh · 1995 · cited in 1 New Hampshire opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
1 sentence

2006Healey v. Town of New Durham, 140 N.H. 232, 240 (1995).

11
Rye Beach Village District v. Beaudoingreen
nh · 1974 · cited in 1 New Hampshire opinions naming this issue, 1984–1984
2 sentences

1984See Rye Beach Village Dist. v. Beaudoin, 114 N.H. 1, 7 , 315 A.2d 181, 184 (1974).

1984See Rye Beach Village Dist. v. Beaudoin, 114 N.H. 1, 7 , 315 A.2d 181, 184 (1974).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
New Canaan Bank & Trust v. Pfeffer green
nh · 2001
1 sentence

2003Id.

12003–2003

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check