arbitrability analysis (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

arbitrability analysis in New Jersey

6 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1960–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Janell Goffe v. Foulke Management Corp Sasha Robinson and Tijuana Johnson v. Mall Chevrolet (081258) (Camden County and Statewide)green
nj · 2019 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025The same approach pertains to issues of arbitrability." Goffe, 238 N.J. at 195 (internal citations omitted). "[T]o be decided by a court, an arbitrability challenge—a challenge as to whether a particular matter is subject to arbitration or can be decided by a court—must be directed at the delegation clause itself (which itself constitutes an arbitration agreement subject to A-0079-24 7 enforcement)." Ibid. "[A] general challenge to the validity of the agreement as a whole will not suffice to permit arbitration to be avoided." The term "public injunctive relief" was first used by the California

2025The same approach pertains to issues of arbitrability." Goffe, 238 N.J. at 195 (internal citations omitted). "[T]o be decided by a court, an arbitrability challenge—a challenge as to whether a particular matter is subject to arbitration or can be decided by a court—must be directed at the delegation clause itself (which itself constitutes an arbitration agreement subject to A-0079-24 7 enforcement)." Ibid. "[A] general challenge to the validity of the agreement as a whole will not suffice to permit arbitration to be avoided." The term "public injunctive relief" was first used by the California

11
Leodori v. Cigna Corp.green
nj · 2003 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013We have explained that “ ‘a state cannot subject an arbitration agreement to more burdensome requirements than those governing the formation of other contracts.’ ” Hojnowski, supra, 187 N.J. at 342, 901 A.2d 381 (quoting Leodori v. CIGNA Corp., 175 N.J. 293, 302, 814 A.2d 1098 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 938 , 124 S.Ct. 74 , 157 L.Ed.2d 250 (2003)).

2013We have explained that “ ‘a state cannot subject an arbitration agreement to more burdensome requirements than those governing the formation of other contracts.’ ” Hojnowski, supra, 187 N.J. at 342, 901 A.2d 381 (quoting Leodori v. CIGNA Corp., 175 N.J. 293, 302, 814 A.2d 1098 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 938 , 124 S.Ct. 74 , 157 L.Ed.2d 250 (2003)).

11
HOJNOWSKI EX REL. HOJNOWSKI v. Vans Skate Parkgreen
nj · 2006 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013We have explained that “ ‘a state cannot subject an arbitration agreement to more burdensome requirements than those governing the formation of other contracts.’ ” Hojnowski, supra, 187 N.J. at 342, 901 A.2d 381 (quoting Leodori v. CIGNA Corp., 175 N.J. 293, 302, 814 A.2d 1098 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 938 , 124 S.Ct. 74 , 157 L.Ed.2d 250 (2003)).

2013We have explained that “ ‘a state cannot subject an arbitration agreement to more burdensome requirements than those governing the formation of other contracts.’ ” Hojnowski, supra, 187 N.J. at 342, 901 A.2d 381 (quoting Leodori v. CIGNA Corp., 175 N.J. 293, 302, 814 A.2d 1098 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 938 , 124 S.Ct. 74 , 157 L.Ed.2d 250 (2003)).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
At&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion green
scotus · 2011
1 sentence

2020Id. at 552 (citing AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 , 339 (2011)).

12020–2020
Skuse v. Pfizer, Inc. green
njsuperctappdiv · 2019
1 sentence

2020Id. at 552 (citing AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 , 339 (2011)).

12020–2020
Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson green
scotus · 2010
2 sentences

2019Rent-A-Center, W., Inc. v. Jackson , 561 U.S. 63 , 72, 130 S.Ct. 2772 , 177 L.Ed.2d 403 (2010).

2019Rent-A-Center, W., Inc. v. Jackson , 561 U.S. 63 , 72, 130 S.Ct. 2772 , 177 L.Ed.2d 403 (2010).

12019–2019
Anderson, Warden v. Depew green
scotus · 2003
1 sentence

2013We have explained that “ ‘a state cannot subject an arbitration agreement to more burdensome requirements than those governing the formation of other contracts.’ ” Hojnowski, supra, 187 N.J. at 342, 901 A.2d 381 (quoting Leodori v. CIGNA Corp., 175 N.J. 293, 302, 814 A.2d 1098 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 938 , 124 S.Ct. 74 , 157 L.Ed.2d 250 (2003)).

12013–2013
Moore v. Hannon Food Service, Inc. green
scotus · 2003
1 sentence

2013We have explained that “ ‘a state cannot subject an arbitration agreement to more burdensome requirements than those governing the formation of other contracts.’ ” Hojnowski, supra, 187 N.J. at 342, 901 A.2d 381 (quoting Leodori v. CIGNA Corp., 175 N.J. 293, 302, 814 A.2d 1098 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 938 , 124 S.Ct. 74 , 157 L.Ed.2d 250 (2003)).

12013–2013
Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Trull green
scotus · 2003
1 sentence

2013We have explained that “ ‘a state cannot subject an arbitration agreement to more burdensome requirements than those governing the formation of other contracts.’ ” Hojnowski, supra, 187 N.J. at 342, 901 A.2d 381 (quoting Leodori v. CIGNA Corp., 175 N.J. 293, 302, 814 A.2d 1098 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 938 , 124 S.Ct. 74 , 157 L.Ed.2d 250 (2003)).

12013–2013
City of Newark v. Township of Jefferson green
nj · 1993
1 sentence

1998Defendant relies on Van Syoc v. Walter, 259 N.J.Super. 337, 339 , 613 A.2d 490 (App.Div.1992), certif. denied, 133 N.J. 430 , 627 A.2d 1136 (1993), to support the arbitrability of its claim that it was fraudulently induced to sign the Final Agreement.

11998–1998
Van Syoc v. Walter green
njsuperctappdiv · 1992
2 sentences

1998Defendant relies on Van Syoc v. Walter, 259 N.J.Super. 337, 339 , 613 A.2d 490 (App.Div.1992), certif. denied, 133 N.J. 430 , 627 A.2d 1136 (1993), to support the arbitrability of its claim that it was fraudulently induced to sign the Final Agreement.

1998Defendant relies on Van Syoc v. Walter, 259 N.J.Super. 337, 339 , 613 A.2d 490 (App.Div.1992), certif. denied, 133 N.J. 430 , 627 A.2d 1136 (1993), to support the arbitrability of its claim that it was fraudulently induced to sign the Final Agreement.

11998–1998
Botany Mills, Inc. v. TEXTILE WORKERS UNION, ETC. green
njsuperctappdiv · 1958
1 sentence

1960That they did not express their intention by including a broader arbitrability clause, see Botany Mills, Inc. v. Textile Workers Union, supra, 50 N.J.

11960–1960

Where else courts name it

SC 57 (1999–2026) NY 13 (1976–2017) OH 12 (2003–2024) AL 10 (1999–2018) TX 8 (2001–2026) CA 7 (1963–2025) NJ 6 (1960–2025) NC 4 (2000–2018) IL 4 (2009–2025) MO 4 (2015–2025) FL 3 (2012–2024) DE 3 (2015–2024) MI 3 (1982–2023) CT 3 (1995–2007) VI 2 (2005–2005) RI 2 (2022–2023) MA 2 (2004–2022) WA 2 (2025–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check