evidence admitted error (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

evidence admitted error in New Jersey

6 New Jersey opinions name it 1 courts 2019–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Fausto Camacho (072525)green
nj · 2014 · cited in 3 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
2 sentences

2019See, e.g. , State v. Camacho , 218 N.J. 533 , 554-55, 95 A.3d 635 (2014) (holding that failure to give a no-adverse inference charge was harmless error because the jury was instructed that the defendant had no obligation to testify, and the State presented "overwhelming evidence" of guilt); *246 State v. Sterling , 215 N.J. 65 , 105-06, 71 A.3d 786 (2013) (holding erroneous joinder of cases was harmless as to the defendants against whom there was overwhelming evidence of guilt, but not as to the defendant against whom the evidence was weaker).

2019See, e.g. , State v. Camacho , 218 N.J. 533 , 554-55, 95 A.3d 635 (2014) (holding that failure to give a no-adverse inference charge was harmless error because the jury was instructed that the defendant had no obligation to testify, and the State presented "overwhelming evidence" of guilt); *246 State v. Sterling , 215 N.J. 65 , 105-06, 71 A.3d 786 (2013) (holding erroneous joinder of cases was harmless as to the defendants against whom there was overwhelming evidence of guilt, but not as to the defendant against whom the evidence was weaker).

33
State v. Sterlinggreen
nj · 2013 · cited in 3 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
2 sentences

2019See, e.g. , State v. Camacho , 218 N.J. 533 , 554-55, 95 A.3d 635 (2014) (holding that failure to give a no-adverse inference charge was harmless error because the jury was instructed that the defendant had no obligation to testify, and the State presented "overwhelming evidence" of guilt); *246 State v. Sterling , 215 N.J. 65 , 105-06, 71 A.3d 786 (2013) (holding erroneous joinder of cases was harmless as to the defendants against whom there was overwhelming evidence of guilt, but not as to the defendant against whom the evidence was weaker).

2019See, e.g. , State v. Camacho , 218 N.J. 533 , 554-55, 95 A.3d 635 (2014) (holding that failure to give a no-adverse inference charge was harmless error because the jury was instructed that the defendant had no obligation to testify, and the State presented "overwhelming evidence" of guilt); *246 State v. Sterling , 215 N.J. 65 , 105-06, 71 A.3d 786 (2013) (holding erroneous joinder of cases was harmless as to the defendants against whom there was overwhelming evidence of guilt, but not as to the defendant against whom the evidence was weaker).

23
State v. Tunggreen
njsuperctappdiv · 2019 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
1 sentence

2021In applying this standard, we "may consider whether, absent the evidence admitted in error, there was overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt.'' State v. Sui Kam Tung, 460 N.J.

11
State v. Ramosgreen
njsuperctappdiv · 1995 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019See State v. Ramos, 282 N.J.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Silver v. Silver green
njsuperctappdiv · 2006
1 sentence

2025He argues the evidence admitted at the hearing did not support the entry of an FRO as required by Silver v. Silver, 387 N.J.

12025–2025

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NJ § N.J. Stat. § 2C:11-3 (4) NJ § N.J. Stat. § 2C:39-5 (4) NJ § N.J. Stat. § 2C:43-7.2 (4) NJ § N.J. Stat. § 2C:12-10 (3) NJ § N.J. Stat. § 2C:17-1 (3) NJ § N.J. Stat. § 2C:18-2 (3) NJ § N.J. Stat. § 2C:22-1 (3) NJ § N.J. Stat. § 2C:28-6 (3) NJ § N.J. Stat. § 2C:29-3 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NE 38 (2003–2026) VA 34 (1993–2026) CT 21 (1994–2025) TX 17 (1972–2024) GA 9 (1988–2025) PA 6 (2007–2025) NJ 6 (2019–2025) OH 4 (2010–2026) IN 4 (1987–2018) CA 3 (1990–2015) WA 3 (1994–2018) MI 2 (2022–2022) NY 2 (2011–2024) IL 2 (2021–2023) OR 2 (2025–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check