Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 1898–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Collective Fed. S. & L. Ass'n v. Toland
green
2 sentences1999In support of this view, the plaintiff cites Collective Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Toland, 207 N.J.Super. 157 , 504 A. 2d 59 (Ch.Div.1985) wherein, it was stated that: The purpose of [Rule 4:42-9] is to allow a prevailing plaintiff in a foreclosure action to obtain counsel fees, contrary to the general American rule, and to limit the amount of such counsel fees. 1999In support of this view, the plaintiff cites Collective Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Toland, 207 N.J.Super. 157 , 504 A. 2d 59 (Ch.Div.1985) wherein, it was stated that: The purpose of [Rule 4:42-9] is to allow a prevailing plaintiff in a foreclosure action to obtain counsel fees, contrary to the general American rule, and to limit the amount of such counsel fees. | 2 | 1989–1999 |
Helton v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co.
green
2 sentences2009This includes reasonable attorney's fees, as awarded here, and those costs that have been traditionally included as reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the attorney that are normally charged to a fee-paying client, such as photocopying, paralegal expenses, travel and telephone costs, and the like. [4] See Helton, supra, 205 N.J.Super. at 201 n. 3, 500 A. 2d 717 . 2009This includes reasonable attorney's fees, as awarded here, and those costs that have been traditionally included as reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the attorney that are normally charged to a fee-paying client, such as photocopying, paralegal expenses, travel and telephone costs, and the like. [4] See Helton, supra, 205 N.J.Super. at 201 n. 3, 500 A. 2d 717 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Williams v. Williams
green
1 sentence1951This view of the law is supported by Williams v. Williams, 23 N.W. 110 , 53 Am. | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Rice v. Coolidge
green
1 sentence1916Rice v. Coolidge, 121 Mass. 393 ; White v. Carroll, 42 N. Y. 161 ; Smith v. Howard, 28 Iowa 51 ; Burns v. McCrate, 32 Me. 442 ; McMillan v. Birch, 1 Binn. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
White v. . Carroll
green
1 sentence1916Rice v. Coolidge, 121 Mass. 393 ; White v. Carroll, 42 N. Y. 161 ; Smith v. Howard, 28 Iowa 51 ; Burns v. McCrate, 32 Me. 442 ; McMillan v. Birch, 1 Binn. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Barnes v. McCrate
green
1 sentence1916Rice v. Coolidge, 121 Mass. 393 ; White v. Carroll, 42 N. Y. 161 ; Smith v. Howard, 28 Iowa 51 ; Burns v. McCrate, 32 Me. 442 ; McMillan v. Birch, 1 Binn. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Smith v. Howard
green
1 sentence1916Rice v. Coolidge, 121 Mass. 393 ; White v. Carroll, 42 N. Y. 161 ; Smith v. Howard, 28 Iowa 51 ; Burns v. McCrate, 32 Me. 442 ; McMillan v. Birch, 1 Binn. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Estate of Smith
green
1 sentence1898Corp. Off. §§ 2193 et seq.; Appeal of Smith, 21 Atl. | 1 | 1898–1898 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.