Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New Jersey opinions name it 1 courts 2017–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Mortongreen1 sentence2026"The mere possibility that evidence could be prejudicial does not justify its exclusion." State v. Morton, 155 N.J. 383, 453-54 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Frisbygreen1 sentence2025A failure to abide by and honor these strictures fatally weakens the role of the jury, depriving a defendant of the right to trial by jury. [Frisby, 174 N.J. at 594 (2002) (quoting State v. Hightower, 120 N.J. 378, 427-28 (1990) (Handler, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)).] The risk that the detectives' statements might have led the jury to a verdict it would not otherwise have reached is compounded by the lack of a limiting instruction regarding how the jury should consider investigative techniques. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hightowergreen1 sentence2025A failure to abide by and honor these strictures fatally weakens the role of the jury, depriving a defendant of the right to trial by jury. [Frisby, 174 N.J. at 594 (2002) (quoting State v. Hightower, 120 N.J. 378, 427-28 (1990) (Handler, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)).] The risk that the detectives' statements might have led the jury to a verdict it would not otherwise have reached is compounded by the lack of a limiting instruction regarding how the jury should consider investigative techniques. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Williamsgreen1 sentence2019State v. Williams, 190 N.J. 114, 133-34 (2007). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lanzogreen1 sentence2017See State v. Lanzo, 44 N.J. 560, 566 (1965) (noting that "the defendant is in no position to urge prejudicial error" where he was afforded the opportunity and declined to propose redactions to an admissible statement). 25 A-1014-14T3 In addition, there was no plain error as to the lack of a limiting instruction. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Muhammad
green
2 sentences2025As we underscored in Muhammad, the trial testimony of both witnesses was played back in its entirety during the jury's deliberations, and "[t]his ameliorated any potential prejudice from the partial playbacks of these witnesses during the prosecutor's summation and from the lack of a limiting instruction." 359 N.J. 2021Thus, just like in Muhammad, the playback of Everett's interview in its entirety "ameliorated any potential prejudice from the partial playbacks . . . during the prosecutor's summation and from the lack of a limiting instruction." Id. at 383 . | 2 | 2021–2025 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.