Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1978–1994 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Westmount Country Club v. Kamenygreen2 sentences1987Westmount Country Club v. Kameny, 82 N.J. 1978The contract at issue in Westmont Country Club v. Kameny, 82 N.J. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Central Steel Drum Co. v. Gold Cooperage, Inc.
green
2 sentences1994Central Steel Drum Co. v. Gold Cooperage, Inc., 200 N.J.Super. 251, 265 , 491 A.2d 49 (concluding “that in the context of commercial parties having comparable bargaining power there should be presumptive validity of a liquidated damage clause”), certif. denied, 101 N.J. 303 , 501 A.2d 960 (1985), overruled on other grounds, Kutzin v. Pirnie, 124 N.J. 500 , 591 A.2d 932 (1991); see also J.L. 1994Central Steel Drum Co. v. Gold Cooperage, Inc., 200 N.J.Super. 251, 265 , 491 A.2d 49 (concluding “that in the context of commercial parties having comparable bargaining power there should be presumptive validity of a liquidated damage clause”), certif. denied, 101 N.J. 303 , 501 A.2d 960 (1985), overruled on other grounds, Kutzin v. Pirnie, 124 N.J. 500 , 591 A.2d 932 (1991); see also J.L. | 3 | 1987–1994 |
State v. Cordero
neutral
2 sentences1994Central Steel Drum Co. v. Gold Cooperage, Inc., 200 N.J.Super. 251, 265 , 491 A.2d 49 (concluding “that in the context of commercial parties having comparable bargaining power there should be presumptive validity of a liquidated damage clause”), certif. denied, 101 N.J. 303 , 501 A.2d 960 (1985), overruled on other grounds, Kutzin v. Pirnie, 124 N.J. 500 , 591 A.2d 932 (1991); see also J.L. 1993Super. 251, 259-60 , 491 A. 2d 49 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 101 N.J. 303 , 501 A. 2d 960 (1985). | 2 | 1993–1994 |
Mah v. Perillo
neutral
2 sentences1994Central Steel Drum Co. v. Gold Cooperage, Inc., 200 N.J.Super. 251, 265 , 491 A.2d 49 (concluding “that in the context of commercial parties having comparable bargaining power there should be presumptive validity of a liquidated damage clause”), certif. denied, 101 N.J. 303 , 501 A.2d 960 (1985), overruled on other grounds, Kutzin v. Pirnie, 124 N.J. 500 , 591 A.2d 932 (1991); see also J.L. 1993Super. 251, 259-60 , 491 A. 2d 49 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 101 N.J. 303 , 501 A. 2d 960 (1985). | 2 | 1993–1994 |
Monsen Engineering Co. v. Tami-Githens, Inc.
green
2 sentences1994Davis & Assocs. v. Heidler, 263 N.J.Super. 264, 274-75 , 622 A.2d 923 (App.Div.1993) (determining that “the party being assessed liquidated damages has the burden ‘to offer proof of contractually acceptable excuses in order to avoid the application of the liquidated damage clause’ ”) (quoting Monsen Eng’g Co. v. Tami-Githens, Inc., 219 N.J.Super. 241, 250 , 530 A.2d 313 (App.Div.1987)). 1994Davis & Assocs. v. Heidler, 263 N.J.Super. 264, 274-75 , 622 A.2d 923 (App.Div.1993) (determining that “the party being assessed liquidated damages has the burden ‘to offer proof of contractually acceptable excuses in order to avoid the application of the liquidated damage clause’ ”) (quoting Monsen Eng’g Co. v. Tami-Githens, Inc., 219 N.J.Super. 241, 250 , 530 A.2d 313 (App.Div.1987)). | 2 | 1993–1994 |
Kutzin v. Pirnie
green
2 sentences1994Central Steel Drum Co. v. Gold Cooperage, Inc., 200 N.J.Super. 251, 265 , 491 A.2d 49 (concluding “that in the context of commercial parties having comparable bargaining power there should be presumptive validity of a liquidated damage clause”), certif. denied, 101 N.J. 303 , 501 A.2d 960 (1985), overruled on other grounds, Kutzin v. Pirnie, 124 N.J. 500 , 591 A.2d 932 (1991); see also J.L. 1994Central Steel Drum Co. v. Gold Cooperage, Inc., 200 N.J.Super. 251, 265 , 491 A.2d 49 (concluding “that in the context of commercial parties having comparable bargaining power there should be presumptive validity of a liquidated damage clause”), certif. denied, 101 N.J. 303 , 501 A.2d 960 (1985), overruled on other grounds, Kutzin v. Pirnie, 124 N.J. 500 , 591 A.2d 932 (1991); see also J.L. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
JL Davis & Associates v. Heidler
green
2 sentences1994Davis & Assocs. v. Heidler, 263 N.J.Super. 264, 274-75 , 622 A.2d 923 (App.Div.1993) (determining that “the party being assessed liquidated damages has the burden ‘to offer proof of contractually acceptable excuses in order to avoid the application of the liquidated damage clause’ ”) (quoting Monsen Eng’g Co. v. Tami-Githens, Inc., 219 N.J.Super. 241, 250 , 530 A.2d 313 (App.Div.1987)). 1994Davis & Assocs. v. Heidler, 263 N.J.Super. 264, 274-75 , 622 A.2d 923 (App.Div.1993) (determining that “the party being assessed liquidated damages has the burden ‘to offer proof of contractually acceptable excuses in order to avoid the application of the liquidated damage clause’ ”) (quoting Monsen Eng’g Co. v. Tami-Githens, Inc., 219 N.J.Super. 241, 250 , 530 A.2d 313 (App.Div.1987)). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Sheehy v. Galipeau
green
1 sentence1991We do not intend by this opinion to affect the applicability or enforceability of such provisions. [7] Cf. Sheehy v. Galipeau, 48 N.J. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
DHM Industries, Inc. v. Central Port Warehouse, Inc.
green
1 sentence1985Industries v. Central Port Warehouse, 127 N.J. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Spialter v. Testa
green
1 sentence1985In Spialter v. Testa, 162 N.J. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.