Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hardwicke v. American Boychoir Schoolgreen2 sentences2006These are: (1) that "[i]n light of the language of the statute as supplemented by the definition of person in Title I [of the Child Sexual Abuse Act (CSAA), N.J.S.A. 2A:61B-1], the extrinsic evidence of legislative intent, and the State's strong policy to hold both active and passive child abusers accountable, we find that the [American Boychoir] School is a person under the passive abuse provision of the CSAA[,]" ante, 188 N.J. at 91, 902 A. 2d at 113 (2006); (2) that "the School's view of its role vis-à-vis its students is accurate and that there are more than sufficient indicia of the exerc 2006These are: (1) that "[i]n light of the language of the statute as supplemented by the definition of person in Title I [of the Child Sexual Abuse Act (CSAA), N.J.S.A. 2A:61B-1], the extrinsic evidence of legislative intent, and the State's strong policy to hold both active and passive child abusers accountable, we find that the [American Boychoir] School is a person under the passive abuse provision of the CSAA[,]" ante, 188 N.J. at 91, 902 A. 2d at 113 (2006); (2) that "the School's view of its role vis-à-vis its students is accurate and that there are more than sufficient indicia of the exerc | 1 | 2 |
Cumberland County Bd. v. WJPgreen2 sentences2002"The proper definition of a person in loco parentis to a child is a person who means to put himself [or herself] in the situation of the lawful father [or mother] of the child with reference to the father's [or mother's] office and duty of making provision for the child." [ Id. at 365-66, 755 A. 2d 1171 (citations omitted).] The in loco parentis principle is a venerable concept. 2002“The proper definition of a person in loco parentis to a child is a person who means to put himself [or herself] in the situation of the lawful father [or mother] of the child with reference to the father’s [or mother’s] office and duty of making provision for the child.” \Id. at 365-66, 755 A.2d 1171 (citations omitted).] The in loco parentis principle is a venerable concept. | 1 | 2 |
Mattete v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2006These are: (1) that “[i]n light of the language of the statute as supplemented by the definition of person in Title I [of the Child Sexual Abuse Act (CSAA), N.J.S.A. 2A:61B-1], the extrinsic evidence of legislative intent, and the State’s strong policy to hold both active and passive child abusers accountable, we find that the [American Boychoir] School is a person under the passive abuse provision of the CSAA[,]” ante, 188 N.J. at 91, 902 A.2d at 113 (2006); (2) that “the School’s view of its role vis-á-vis its students is accurate and that there are more than sufficient indicia of the exerci | 1 | 1 |
Mhb v. Htbgreen2 sentences2002See, e.g., M.H.B. v. H.T.B., 100 N.J. 567 , 498 A.2d 775 (1985); Miller, supra; A.K., supra; N.M., supra. There is no authoritative history in New Jersey of the in loco parentis principle being applied outside of a family-type setting, and there is a paucity of reported cases in other jurisdictions applying the concept that broadly. 2002See, e.g., M.H.B. v. H.T.B., 100 N.J. 567 , 498 A.2d 775 (1985); Miller, supra; A.K., supra; N.M., supra. There is no authoritative history in New Jersey of the in loco parentis principle being applied outside of a family-type setting, and there is a paucity of reported cases in other jurisdictions applying the concept that broadly. | 1 | 1 |
Miller v. Millergreen1 sentence2002"The proper definition of a person in loco parentis to a child is a person who means to put himself [or herself] in the situation of the lawful father [or mother] of the child with reference to the father's [or mother's] office and duty of making provision for the child." [ Id. at 365-66, 755 A. 2d 1171 (citations omitted).] The in loco parentis principle is a venerable concept. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Fb v. Alg
green
2 sentences2003The Appellate Division concluded that “as a matter of law, in the absence of a family-like structure or extraordinary circumstances, the in loco parentis principle and its waiver or estoppel effects may not be used as a surrogate for biological parenthood.” F.B., supra, 350 N.J.Super. at 400 , 795 A.2d 331 . 2003The Appellate Division concluded that “as a matter of law, in the absence of a family-like structure or extraordinary circumstances, the in loco parentis principle and its waiver or estoppel effects may not be used as a surrogate for biological parenthood.” F.B., supra, 350 N.J.Super. at 400 , 795 A.2d 331 . | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.