Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Owen v. CNA INS./CONTINENTAL CASgreen2 sentences2001Id at 612, 750 A.2d 211 . 2001Id. at 617 , 750 A.2d 211 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Aronsohn & Springstead v. Weissman
green
2 sentences2012“Where a person creates for his own benefit a trust with a provision restricting the voluntary or involuntary transfer of his interest, his transferee or creditors can reach his interest.’” Aronsohn & Springstead v. Weissman, 230 N.J.Super. 63, 68 , 552 A.2d 649 (App.Div.1989) (quoting Restatement (Second) on Trusts, § 156(1) (1959)). 2012“Where a person creates for his own benefit a trust with a provision restricting the voluntary or involuntary transfer of his interest, his transferee or creditors can reach his interest.’” Aronsohn & Springstead v. Weissman, 230 N.J.Super. 63, 68 , 552 A.2d 649 (App.Div.1989) (quoting Restatement (Second) on Trusts, § 156(1) (1959)). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Parkway Ins. Co. v. NJ Neck & Back
green
2 sentences2002Rather, it serves as a cost-controlling measure whereby insurance premiums are stabilized and hopefully reduced by eliminating unnecessary court proceedings, arbitrations and fraud. [ Id. at 184 , 748 A. 2d 1221 .] We agree with this analysis. 2002Rather, it serves as a cost-controlling measure whereby insurance premiums are stabilized and hopefully reduced by eliminating unnecessary court proceedings, arbitrations and fraud. [ Id. at 184 , 748 A. 2d 1221 .] We agree with this analysis. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Garden State Buildings, L.P. v. First Fidelity Bank, N.A.
green
2 sentences2001Id. at 520 , 702 A.2d 1315 . 2001Id. at 520 , 702 A.2d 1315 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Obstetricians-Gynecologists, P.C. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
green
1 sentence2001Such evidence indicates a far stronger public policy than that relied on by OB-GYN. [ 361 N.W. 2d at 556 .] In fact, the non-assignment clause has been described variously as "the keystone in the system," Kent General Hosp., supra, 442 A. 2d at 1372 (citing Riddle Mem'l Hosp., supra, 63 Pa. Del. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Liberty Life Assurance Co. of Boston v. Stone Street Capital, Inc.
green
1 sentence2001Similarly, in Liberty Life Assurance Co., supra, 93 F. Supp.2d 630 , the court applied the principles of Restatement section 317(2) in ruling that a non-assignment clause of a structured settlement agreement was enforceable. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Kent General Hospital, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Delaware, Inc.
green
1 sentence2001Such evidence indicates a far stronger public policy than that relied on by OB-GYN. [ 361 N.W. 2d at 556 .] In fact, the non-assignment clause has been described variously as "the keystone in the system," Kent General Hosp., supra, 442 A. 2d at 1372 (citing Riddle Mem'l Hosp., supra, 63 Pa. Del. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Chelsea-Wheeler Coal Co. v. Marvin
green
1 sentence2000Eq. 432, 437-38 , 35 A. 2d 874 (E. & A.1944) which in part states that "even though a contract may prohibit assignment, such prohibition may be disregarded where it is not the main purpose of the contract," and urges that since the primary purpose of the Agreement was to ensure a steady cash flow to the Plaintiff, the non-assignment clause may be sanctioned in order to maintain the safety net afforded by those payments. [5] Despite the laudable goal of protecting Plaintiff from herselfthat is, from making poor financial decisions, it is beyond the province of the judiciary, however tempting i | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Parrish Chiropractic Centers, P.C. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences1998In Parrish, supra, the Court held that, under Colorado's no-fault statute, when there is a non-assignment clause in the policy, assignments of benefits without the written consent of the insurer are void and unenforceable against the insurer. 1998Id. at 1052 (citing 16 Couch on Insurance 2d § 63:159 (1983)). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.