target challenge (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

target challenge in New Jersey

6 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Van Horn v. City of Trentongreen
nj · 1979 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
1 sentence

1985See Van Horn v. City of Trenton, 80 N.J. 528, 534-536 (1979).

11
State v. Slockbowergreen
nj · 1979 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1980–1980
2 sentences

1980See State v. Slockbower, 79 N.J. 1 (1979); State v. Ercolano, 79 N.J. 25 (1979); State v. McDaniel, 156 N.J.Super. 347 (App.Div.1978).

1980See State v. Slockbower, 79 N.J. 1 (1979); State v. Ercolano, 79 N.J. 25 (1979); State v. McDaniel, 156 N.J.

11
South Dakota v. Oppermangreen
scotus · 1976 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1980–1980
2 sentences

1980As in Cady, there is no suggestion whatever that this standard procedure, essentially like that followed throughout the country, was a pretext concealing an investigatory police motive. [Id. at 375-76, 96 S.Ct. at 3100 , 49 L.Ed.2d at 1009 (citation and footnote omitted).] The propriety of the police impoundment inventory procedures has recently been the target of challenge and judicial review in New Jersey.

1980As in Cady, there is no suggestion whatever that this standard procedure, essentially like that followed throughout the country, was a pretext concealing an investigatory police motive. [Id. at 375-76, 96 S.Ct. at 3100 , 49 L.Ed.2d at 1009 (citation and footnote omitted).] The propriety of the police impoundment inventory procedures has recently been the target of challenge and judicial review in New Jersey.

11
State v. Williamsgreen
nj · 1971 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1975–1975
1 sentence

1975The target doctrine was discussed in State v. Williams, 59 N.J. 493, 503 (1971), but it was neither approved nor disapproved.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs. green
scotus · 1978
1 sentence

2020Servs., City of New York, 436 U.S. 658 (1978), that liability may also attach to municipalities.

12020–2020
State v. Vinegra green
nj · 1977
2 sentences

1998At the same time it seeks to protect his privilege against self-incrimination by giving him the use and fruits immunity---- [State v. Vinegra, supra, 73 N.J. at 489 , 376 A.2d 150 .] The statute has not done away with the requirement that a public employee must be a target to be granted use and fruits immunity.

1998At the same time it seeks to protect his privilege against self-incrimination by giving him the use and fruits immunity---- [State v. Vinegra, supra, 73 N.J. at 489 , 376 A.2d 150 .] The statute has not done away with the requirement that a public employee must be a target to be granted use and fruits immunity.

11998–1998
Miranda v. Arizona green
scotus · 1966
2 sentences

1985Further, extension of the target doctrine would invalidate the use of statements which were neither coerced nor invalid under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed. 2d 694 (1966).

1985Further, extension of the target doctrine would invalidate the use of statements which were neither coerced nor invalid under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed. 2d 694 (1966).

11985–1985
State v. McDaniel green
njsuperctappdiv · 1978
2 sentences

1980See State v. Slockbower, 79 N.J. 1 (1979); State v. Ercolano, 79 N.J. 25 (1979); State v. McDaniel, 156 N.J.Super. 347 (App.Div.1978).

1980See State v. Slockbower, 79 N.J. 1 (1979); State v. Ercolano, 79 N.J. 25 (1979); State v. McDaniel, 156 N.J.

11980–1980
State v. Ercolano green
nj · 1979
2 sentences

1980See State v. Slockbower, 79 N.J. 1 (1979); State v. Ercolano, 79 N.J. 25 (1979); State v. McDaniel, 156 N.J.Super. 347 (App.Div.1978).

1980See State v. Slockbower, 79 N.J. 1 (1979); State v. Ercolano, 79 N.J. 25 (1979); State v. McDaniel, 156 N.J.

11980–1980
State v. Sibilia green
njsuperctappdiv · 1965
1 sentence

1977State v. Sibilia, 88 N.J.

11977–1977

Where else courts name it

CA 28 (2002–2025) NY 7 (1968–2019) NJ 6 (1975–2020) IL 4 (1987–2021) MA 4 (1999–2025) AZ 3 (1987–1998) GA 2 (2013–2013) UT 2 (1988–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check