express statute rule (New Mexico) · Go Syfert
← New Mexico issues

express statute rule in New Mexico

6 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1961–2008 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Morrisgreen
nm · 1961 · cited in 2 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 1985–2000
2 sentences

1985Nevertheless, “[i]n the absence of an express statute or rule, no appeal will lie from anything other than a formal written order or judgment signed by the judge and filed in the case or entered upon the records of the court and signed by the judge thereof.” State v. Morris, 69 N.M. 89, 90-91 , 364 P.2d 348, 349 (1961).

1985Nevertheless, “[i]n the absence of an express statute or rule, no appeal will lie from anything other than a formal written order or judgment signed by the judge and filed in the case or entered upon the records of the court and signed by the judge thereof.” State v. Morris, 69 N.M. 89, 90-91 , 364 P.2d 348, 349 (1961).

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Durant green
nmctapp · 2000
2 sentences

2008State v. Durant, 2000-NMCA-066 , ¶ 5, 129 N.M. 345 , 7 P.3d 495 (citations omitted). {20} Informal expressions of a court’s rulings are not appealable final orders or judgments.

2008State v. Durant, 2000-NMCA-066 , ¶ 5, 129 N.M. 345 , 7 P.3d 495 (citations omitted). {20} Informal expressions of a court’s rulings are not appealable final orders or judgments.

22003–2008
State v. Thorne green
wash · 1951
2 sentences

1964State v. Thorne, 39 Wash.2d 63 , 234 P.2d 528 ; State v. McClain, 186 Tenn. 401 , 210 S.W.2d 680 .

1964State v. Thorne, 39 Wash.2d 63 , 234 P.2d 528 ; State v. McClain, 186 Tenn. 401 , 210 S.W.2d 680 .

21961–1964
McClain v. State green
tenn · 1948
2 sentences

1964State v. Thorne, 39 Wash.2d 63 , 234 P.2d 528 ; State v. McClain, 186 Tenn. 401 , 210 S.W.2d 680 .

1964State v. Thorne, 39 Wash.2d 63 , 234 P.2d 528 ; State v. McClain, 186 Tenn. 401 , 210 S.W.2d 680 .

21961–1964

Where else courts name it

NM 6 (1961–2008) CA 3 (1990–2017) ID 2 (1982–1983)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check