illustration violation in New Mexico

6 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1913–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

Case	Followed	Cited
United States v. Pipergreen ca1 · 2002 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 1 sentence 2009To that end, Rule 11-106 permits “the introduction of recorded statements that place in context other writings admitted into evidence which, viewed alone, may be misleading.” State v. Carr, 95 N.M. 755, 767 , 626 P.2d 292, 304 (Ct.App.1981), overruled on other grounds by State v. Olguin, 118 N.M. 91 , 879 P.2d 92 (Ct.App.1994); accord Beech Aircraft Corp., 488 U.S. at 172 , 109 S.Ct. 439 (“[W]hen one party has made use of a portion of a document, such that misunderstanding or distortion can be averted only through presentation of another portion, the material required for completeness is ipso	1	1
Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Raineygreen scotus · 1988 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 2 sentences 2009To that end, Rule 11-106 permits “the introduction of recorded statements that place in context other writings admitted into evidence which, viewed alone, may be misleading.” State v. Carr, 95 N.M. 755, 767 , 626 P.2d 292, 304 (Ct.App.1981), overruled on other grounds by State v. Olguin, 118 N.M. 91 , 879 P.2d 92 (Ct.App.1994); accord Beech Aircraft Corp., 488 U.S. at 172 , 109 S.Ct. 439 (“[W]hen one party has made use of a portion of a document, such that misunderstanding or distortion can be averted only through presentation of another portion, the material required for completeness is ipso 2009To that end, Rule 11-106 permits “the introduction of recorded statements that place in context other writings admitted into evidence which, viewed alone, may be misleading.” State v. Carr, 95 N.M. 755, 767 , 626 P.2d 292, 304 (Ct.App.1981), overruled on other grounds by State v. Olguin, 118 N.M. 91 , 879 P.2d 92 (Ct.App.1994); accord Beech Aircraft Corp., 488 U.S. at 172 , 109 S.Ct. 439 (“[W]hen one party has made use of a portion of a document, such that misunderstanding or distortion can be averted only through presentation of another portion, the material required for completeness is ipso	1	1
United States v. Fred Awongreen ca1 · 1998 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 1 sentence 2009To that end, Rule 11-106 permits “the introduction of recorded statements that place in context other writings admitted into evidence which, viewed alone, may be misleading.” State v. Carr, 95 N.M. 755, 767 , 626 P.2d 292, 304 (Ct.App.1981), overruled on other grounds by State v. Olguin, 118 N.M. 91 , 879 P.2d 92 (Ct.App.1994); accord Beech Aircraft Corp., 488 U.S. at 172 , 109 S.Ct. 439 (“[W]hen one party has made use of a portion of a document, such that misunderstanding or distortion can be averted only through presentation of another portion, the material required for completeness is ipso	1	1
United States v. Jose Ramos-Caraballogreen ca8 · 2004 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 2 sentences 2009To that end, Rule 11-106 permits “the introduction of recorded statements that place in context other writings admitted into evidence which, viewed alone, may be misleading.” State v. Carr, 95 N.M. 755, 767 , 626 P.2d 292, 304 (Ct.App.1981), overruled on other grounds by State v. Olguin, 118 N.M. 91 , 879 P.2d 92 (Ct.App.1994); accord Beech Aircraft Corp., 488 U.S. at 172 , 109 S.Ct. 439 (“[W]hen one party has made use of a portion of a document, such that misunderstanding or distortion can be averted only through presentation of another portion, the material required for completeness is ipso 2009To that end, Rule 11-106 permits “the introduction of recorded statements that place in context other writings admitted into evidence which, viewed alone, may be misleading.” State v. Carr, 95 N.M. 755, 767 , 626 P.2d 292, 304 (Ct.App.1981), overruled on other grounds by State v. Olguin, 118 N.M. 91 , 879 P.2d 92 (Ct.App.1994); accord Beech Aircraft Corp., 488 U.S. at 172 , 109 S.Ct. 439 (“[W]hen one party has made use of a portion of a document, such that misunderstanding or distortion can be averted only through presentation of another portion, the material required for completeness is ipso	1	1
State v. Carrgreen nmctapp · 1981 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 2 sentences 2009To that end, Rule 11-106 permits “the introduction of recorded statements that place in context other writings admitted into evidence which, viewed alone, may be misleading.” State v. Carr, 95 N.M. 755, 767 , 626 P.2d 292, 304 (Ct.App.1981), overruled on other grounds by State v. Olguin, 118 N.M. 91 , 879 P.2d 92 (Ct.App.1994); accord Beech Aircraft Corp., 488 U.S. at 172 , 109 S.Ct. 439 (“[W]hen one party has made use of a portion of a document, such that misunderstanding or distortion can be averted only through presentation of another portion, the material required for completeness is ipso 2009To that end, Rule 11-106 permits “the introduction of recorded statements that place in context other writings admitted into evidence which, viewed alone, may be misleading.” State v. Carr, 95 N.M. 755, 767 , 626 P.2d 292, 304 (Ct.App.1981), overruled on other grounds by State v. Olguin, 118 N.M. 91 , 879 P.2d 92 (Ct.App.1994); accord Beech Aircraft Corp., 488 U.S. at 172 , 109 S.Ct. 439 (“[W]hen one party has made use of a portion of a document, such that misunderstanding or distortion can be averted only through presentation of another portion, the material required for completeness is ipso	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

Case	Cited	Years
Continental Potash, Inc. v. Freeport-McMoran, Inc. green nm · 1993 2 sentences 2025We conclude that Isler and 11 Elliott Industries provide no reason to affirm the district court on this point. 12 {32} In addition to Isler and Elliott Industries, Marathon relies on Rio Grande 13 Jewelers Supply, Inc. v. Data General Corp., 1984-NMSC-094 , 101 N.M. 798 , 689 14 P.2d 1269 , and Continental Potash, Inc. v. Freeport-McMoran, Inc., 1993-NMSC- 15 039, 115 N.M. 690 , 858 P.2d 66 , to argue that “liability cannot be premised upon 16 extra-contractual tort duties.” But the holding in Rio Grande Jewelers Supply, Inc. 17 is simply an illustration of the rule that limited liability must 2025We conclude that Isler and 11 Elliott Industries provide no reason to affirm the district court on this point. 12 {32} In addition to Isler and Elliott Industries, Marathon relies on Rio Grande 13 Jewelers Supply, Inc. v. Data General Corp., 1984-NMSC-094 , 101 N.M. 798 , 689 14 P.2d 1269 , and Continental Potash, Inc. v. Freeport-McMoran, Inc., 1993-NMSC- 15 039, 115 N.M. 690 , 858 P.2d 66 , to argue that “liability cannot be premised upon 16 extra-contractual tort duties.” But the holding in Rio Grande Jewelers Supply, Inc. 17 is simply an illustration of the rule that limited liability must	1	2025–2025
Rio Grande Jewelers Supply, Inc. v. Data General Corp. green nm · 1984 1 sentence 2025We conclude that Isler and 11 Elliott Industries provide no reason to affirm the district court on this point. 12 {32} In addition to Isler and Elliott Industries, Marathon relies on Rio Grande 13 Jewelers Supply, Inc. v. Data General Corp., 1984-NMSC-094 , 101 N.M. 798 , 689 14 P.2d 1269 , and Continental Potash, Inc. v. Freeport-McMoran, Inc., 1993-NMSC- 15 039, 115 N.M. 690 , 858 P.2d 66 , to argue that “liability cannot be premised upon 16 extra-contractual tort duties.” But the holding in Rio Grande Jewelers Supply, Inc. 17 is simply an illustration of the rule that limited liability must	1	2025–2025
State v. Tollardo green nm · 2012 1 sentence 2012“The classic illustration of a violation of the rule of completeness is 11 quoting ‘there is no God’ from the biblical phrase ‘[t]he fool hath said in his heart, there is no God.’” Id. (citation omitted). {42} The rule of completeness did not apply to the letters Defendant tried to admit.	1	2012–2012
State v. Olguin green nmctapp · 1994 2 sentences 2009To that end, Rule 11-106 permits “the introduction of recorded statements that place in context other writings admitted into evidence which, viewed alone, may be misleading.” State v. Carr, 95 N.M. 755, 767 , 626 P.2d 292, 304 (Ct.App.1981), overruled on other grounds by State v. Olguin, 118 N.M. 91 , 879 P.2d 92 (Ct.App.1994); accord Beech Aircraft Corp., 488 U.S. at 172 , 109 S.Ct. 439 (“[W]hen one party has made use of a portion of a document, such that misunderstanding or distortion can be averted only through presentation of another portion, the material required for completeness is ipso 2009To that end, Rule 11-106 permits “the introduction of recorded statements that place in context other writings admitted into evidence which, viewed alone, may be misleading.” State v. Carr, 95 N.M. 755, 767 , 626 P.2d 292, 304 (Ct.App.1981), overruled on other grounds by State v. Olguin, 118 N.M. 91 , 879 P.2d 92 (Ct.App.1994); accord Beech Aircraft Corp., 488 U.S. at 172 , 109 S.Ct. 439 (“[W]hen one party has made use of a portion of a document, such that misunderstanding or distortion can be averted only through presentation of another portion, the material required for completeness is ipso	1	2009–2009
State v. Goodrich green nm · 1918 2 sentences 1976The only illustration of the rule in New Mexico is found in State v. Goodrich, 24 N.M. 660 , 176 P. 813 (1918). 1976The only illustration of the rule in New Mexico is found in State v. Goodrich, 24 N.M. 660 , 176 P. 813 (1918).	1	1976–1976
State v. Shipley green mo · 1903 1 sentence 1928An illustration of error in instructing orally is found in State v. Shipley, 174, Mo. 512, 74 S. W. 612 .	1	1928–1928
Sharon v. Terry green · 1888 2 sentences 1913This is the illustration of the rule where the parties are the same in all three-of the courts.” In commenting upon the illustration of the principle-given in this case, Mr. Justice Field, in the Circuit Court in the case of Sharon v. Terry, 36 Fed. 337, 359 , uses the-following language: “The exceptions to the doctrine that priority of jurisdiction controls priority of decision, to which we have-referred, and to which our attention has been called bv counsel of the defendants, will be found on examination to range themselves under two classes: First, where the-same plaintiff has asked in the 1913This is the illustration of the rule where the parties are the same in all three-of the courts.” In commenting upon the illustration of the principle-given in this case, Mr. Justice Field, in the Circuit Court in the case of Sharon v. Terry, 36 Fed. 337, 359 , uses the-following language: “The exceptions to the doctrine that priority of jurisdiction controls priority of decision, to which we have-referred, and to which our attention has been called bv counsel of the defendants, will be found on examination to range themselves under two classes: First, where the-same plaintiff has asked in the	1	1913–1913

Where else courts name it

NY 22 (1833–1982) IL 22 (1866–2013) CA 15 (1919–2018) PA 14 (1846–1979) MD 11 (1895–2016) GA 10 (1852–2017) MO 8 (1871–2010) CT 8 (1934–2012) OR 7 (1908–2007) NC 7 (1876–1959) FL 6 (1962–2012) IA 6 (1903–2011) AL 6 (1846–1985) TX 6 (1941–2001) KS 6 (1900–1952) NM 6 (1913–2025) MN 5 (1890–1954) MI 5 (1899–2021) NJ 5 (1901–2011) WA 5 (1905–2013) CO 4 (1912–2016) WI 4 (1872–1971) TN 3 (1887–1945) UT 3 (1926–1998) LA 3 (1925–1942) NE 2 (1893–1963) SC 2 (1851–2008) WV 2 (1903–1992) AZ 2 (1962–1981) AR 2 (1915–1937) ID 2 (1978–1983) MA 2 (1907–1910) IN 2 (1895–2020) VT 2 (1854–1874)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check